Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Summit Co

Court

Summit Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2026-01-29
Type Injunction
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Nuco Software Llc
Defendant Quickconnex Llc
Photo of Hon. Susan Baker Ross

Judge

Hon. Susan Baker Ross

Summit County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. EX. 11
  2. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed CHRISTOPHER CARL ESKER
  3. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed WILLIAM G. CHRIS
  4. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed MICHAEL JAMES ELLIOTT
  5. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed WILLIAM G. CHRIS
  6. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed QUICKCONNEX LLC
  7. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed MICHAEL JAMES ELLIOTT
  8. Certificate of Mailing Service - Mailed CHRISTOPHER CARL ESKER
  9. NOTICE ISSUED - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING CHRIS, WILLIAM G.
  10. NOTICE ISSUED - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING QUICKCONNEX LLC
  11. NOTICE ISSUED - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING ELLIOTT, MICHAEL JAMES
  12. NOTICE ISSUED - CERTIFICATE OF MAILING ESKER, CHRISTOPHER CARL
  13. SUPERSEDEAS BOND $100.00 CHECK POSTED AS REQUIRED BY THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER.
  14. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, INCLUDING REVIEW OF THE VERIFIED COMPLAINT AND THE EXHIBITS FILED THEREWITH AND PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 65, THE COURT FINDS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION WELL TAKEN, AND THE SAME IS HEREBY GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT QUICKCONNEX LLC AND ANY OTHER INDIVIDUAL/OR ENTITIES CONTROLLED BY IT) SHALL HENCEFORTH AND WITHOUT DELAY BE ENJOINED FROM VIOLATING THE OPERATION AGREEMENT OR NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT, COMPETING WITH NUCO SOFTWARE, LLC AND/OR UTILIZING ITS TRADE SECRETS AND CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY INFORMATION IN VIOLATION OF THE AGREEMENTS AND THAT THIS TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANT QUICKCONNEX, LLC SHALL BE IMPOSED IMMEDIATELY BY THE COURT. THE COURT FINDS THAT CONSISTENT WITH CIV. R. 65(C) PLAINTIFFS SHALL DEPOSIT WITH CLERK OF COURTS A GOOD AND SUFFICIENT BOND IN THE AMOUNT OF $100.00 AS SECURITY FOR THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER SHALL BE IMPOSED AND ENFORCEABLE UPON PLAINTIFF'S DEPOSIT WITH THE CLERK OF COURTS AS BOND AS SET FORTH HEREIN AND THE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE AND MAY BE FULLY ENFORCE PURSUANT TO CIV. R. 65(A) PENIDNG THE COURT'S FUIRTHER CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOITON FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, WHICH SHALL BE HEARD BY THE CURT ON FEBRUARY 12, 2026 AT 1:00 P.M. MAGISTRATE CLETUS PULLIAM.
  15. MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND TEMPORARY INJUNCTION
  16. SUMMONS ISSUED BY FEDEX QUICKCONNEX LLC
  17. CIVIL COMPLAINT FILED
  18. INSTRUCTIONS TO CLERK FOR SERVICE
  19. EX 1
  20. EX 2
  21. EX. 3
  22. EX. 4
  23. EX. 5
  24. EX. 6
  25. EX. 7
  26. EX. 8
  27. EX. 9
  28. EX. 10

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more