Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-08-04
Status NEW - NEW
Type Cg Defamation
Docket 36 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Howard, Mary Wilson
Defendant Howard, Philip
Photo of Hon. Miller, Kathleen M

Judge

Hon. Miller, Kathleen M

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING DEFAMATION
  2. EXHIBITS
  3. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  4. CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT
  5. PRAECIPE FILED
  6. SUMMONS
  7. ORDER
  8. MOTION PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPER
  9. PROPOSED ORDER
  10. ORDER
  11. LETTER
  12. ORDER
  13. IN FORMA PAUPERIS ORDER
  14. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 5, 2025 ORDER ACCEPTED BY: SNA TRANSACTION ID: 76782243
  15. MOTION PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPER
  16. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 5, 2025 IFP ACCEPTED BY: SNA TRANSACTION ID: 76782243
  17. PROPOSED ORDER
  18. PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2025 INITIAL REVIEW ACCEPTED BY: M TRANSACTION ID: 77053825
  19. ORDER
  20. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2025 IFP ORDER ACCEPTED BY: SNA TRANSACTION ID: 77053825
  21. LETTER
  22. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2025 LETTER, THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE HAS BEEN GRANTED PER JUDGE MILLER ON AUGUST 20, 2025. PLEASE PAY $75.00 IN FILING FEES. THE COMPLAINT IS NOT DISMISSED, AND SERVICE OF PROCESS SHALL ISSUE. ACCEPTED BY: LV TRANSACTION ID: 77053932
  23. ORDER
  24. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2025 ORDER UPON INITIAL REVIEW OF COMPLAINT IS NOT DISMISSED PER JUDGE MILER ON SEPTEMBER 9, 2025. SERVICE OF PROCESS SHALL ISSUE. ACCEPTED BY: LV TRANSACTION ID: 77053932
  25. IN FORMA PAUPERIS ORDER
  26. IN FORMA PAUPERIS ORDER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 12, 2025 ORDER ON APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS WAS GRANTED ON AUGUST 20, 2025. PER JUDGE MILLER PLEASE PAY $75.00 IN FILING FEES. ACCEPTED BY: LV TRANSACTION ID: 77053932
  27. LETTER
  28. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 17, 2026 IN REVIEWING THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION, IT APPEARS THAT THIS MATTER CANNOT PRESENTLY PROCEED BECAUSE SERVICE OF PROCESS OR AN ANSWER IS LACKING. PLAINTIFF MUST REPORT BACK TO THE COURT ON THE STATUS OF THIS CASE WITHIN 15 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS NOTICE. AT THE DIRECTION OF JUDGE KATHLEEN M. MILLER, FAILURE BY PLAINTIFF TO COMPLY WITH THIS LETTER MAY RESULT IN THE COURT DEEMING DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE AS UNOPPOSED AND THE COURT MAY DISMISS THIS ACTION WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO THE PLAINTIFF(S). ACCEPTED BY: DR TRANSACTION ID: 78229024

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more