Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Contra Costa County

Court

Contra Costa County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2024-09-25
Status Active
Type 22: Unlimited Auto
Docket 31 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Cendejas, Yolanda
Defendant City Of Oakley|Gentry, Brandon Thomas|Gonzales, Myranda Nicole|Does 1 Through 10, Inclusive
Photo of Hon. Hiramoto, Joni T

Judge

Hon. Hiramoto, Joni T

Contra Costa County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. *Further Case Management Conference Judicial Officer Hiramoto, Joni T Hearing Time 8:30 AM
  2. Initial Complaint Filed View Document Initial Complaint Filed
  3. Civil Case Cover Sheet View Document Civil Case Cover Sheet
  4. Summons Issued/Filed View Document Summons Issued/Filed
  5. Service of Complaint and Summons Requested By Cendejas, Yolanda Unserved
  6. Declaration of View Document DEC OF SHEILA D. CRAWFORD REGARDING INABILITY TO COMPLY WITH MEET AND CONFER REQUIREMENT Comment SHEILA D. CRAWFORD REGARDING INABILITY TO COMPLY WITH MEET AND CONFER REQUIREMENT
  7. E-Filing Rejection Comment Envelope #17447648 - Case # C24-02585 Submitted 11/27/2024 Re Complaint for Personal Injury. If this is a 1st Amended Complaint, please caption it as a First Amended Complaint.
  8. Amended Complaint Filed View Document Pltfs 1st Amended Complaint Filed Comment Pltfs 1st Amended Complaint Filed
  9. Notes Comment as to Initial Complaint. 1st Amended Complaint Filed
  10. Service of Amended Complaint Requested By Cendejas, Yolanda Unserved Unserved Unserved
  11. Declaration of View Document Declaration Of Sheila D. Crawford RE Inability to Comply w/ Meet and Confer Requirement Comment Sheila D. Crawford RE Inability to Comply w/ Meet and Confer Requirement
  12. Notes Comment Answer of City of Oakley Filed
  13. Answer/Response/Denial - Unlimited View Document Answer/Response/Denial of City of Oakley to 1st Amended Complaint Comment of City of Oakley to 1st Amended Complaint
  14. Case Management Conference Statement Filed View Document Case Management Conference Statement Filed From: YOLANDA CENDEJAS Comment From: YOLANDA CENDEJAS
  15. Case Management Conference Statement Filed View Document Case Management Conference Statement Filed From: CITY OF OAKLEY Comment From: CITY OF OAKLEY
  16. Notice of Remote Appearance View Document Notice of Remote Appearance
  17. Notice of Posting Jury Fees View Document Notice of Posting Jury Fees
  18. *Case Management Conference Original Type *Case Management Conference View Document CMC Notice - Fast Track View Document Minutes Judicial Officer Douglas, Danielle K Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  19. Cross Complaint - No Fee View Document Cross Complaint of City of Oakley Comment of City of Oakley
  20. Summons Issued/Filed View Document Summons on Cross Complaint Comment on Cross Complaint
  21. Service of Complaint and Summons Served 11/05/2025 Unserved
  22. Case Management Conference Statement Filed View Document Case Management Conference Statement Filed From: Yolanda Cendejas Comment From: Yolanda Cendejas
  23. Proof of Electronic Service View Document Proof of Electronic Service re CMC Comment Re CMC
  24. Case Management Conference Statement Filed View Document Case Management Conference Statement Filed From: CITY OF OAKLEY Comment From: CITY OF OAKLEY
  25. *Further Case Management Conference Original Type *Further Case Management Conference View Document Notice of Continuance View Document Notice of Continuance View Document Notice of Continuance View Document Notice of Continuance View Document Notice of Continuance View Document Minutes Judicial Officer Hiramoto, Joni T Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held
  26. General Denial Filed View Document General Denial Filed
  27. Proof of Service of Summons View Document Proof of Service of Summons on cross-complaint as to Brandon Thomas Gentry pers serv 11/5/25 Comment on cross-complaint as to Brandon Thomas Gentry pers serv 11/5/25
  28. Case Management Conference Statement Filed View Document Case Management Conference Statement from Yolanda Cendejas Comment Case Management Conference Statement from Yolanda Cendejas
  29. Proof of Electronic Service Comment CMCS, Emailed on 11/24/25
  30. Case Management Conference Statement Filed View Document Case Management Conference Statement Filed From: City of Oakley Comment From: City of Oakley
  31. *Further Case Management Conference Original Type *Further Case Management Conference View Document Minutes Judicial Officer Hiramoto, Joni T Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Held

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more