Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-08-05
Status CLOSED - CLOSED
Type Cf Debt / Breach Of Contract
Docket 47 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Nestl Usa, Inc.
Defendant Worlee Natural Products Inc.
Photo of Hon. Miller, Kathleen M

Judge

Hon. Miller, Kathleen M

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. ORDER
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  6. ANSWER
  7. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  8. MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
  9. MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE
  10. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  11. ORDER - PRO HAC VICE
  12. ORDER - PRO HAC VICE
  13. LETTER
  14. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  15. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD
  16. SCHEDULING ORDER
  17. E-MAIL FILED
  18. CONFIRMATION DISMISSAL LETTER
  19. CASE SETTLED
  20. CASE SETTLED
  21. STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
  22. ORDER - PRO HAC VICE DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 11, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: MILLER, KATHLEEN M GRANTED (PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING THE ADMISSION OF MARCEL C. DUHAMEL, ESQUIRE TO REPRESENT PLAINTIFF NESTL USA, INC.) ACCEPTED BY: DR TRANSACTION ID: 77283748
  23. ORDER - PRO HAC VICE
  24. ORDER - PRO HAC VICE DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 11, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: MILLER, KATHLEEN M GRANTED (PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING THE ADMISSION OF KAREY E. WERNER, ESQUIRE TO REPRESENT PLAINTIFF NESTL USA, INC.) ACCEPTED BY: DR TRANSACTION ID: 77283794
  25. LETTER
  26. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 14, 2025 THIS CONFIRMS THAT A SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS SET FOR OCTOBER 15, 2025 AT 11:00 A.M. OVER ZOOM, VIA COURTSCRIBES. COUNSEL ARE TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS WITH COURTSCRIBES AND PROVIDE LOGIN CREDENTIALS TO THE COURT. ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 77292424
  27. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  28. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 16, 2025 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD ON OCTOBER 15, 2025 WITH JUDGE MILLER. TRIAL (4) DAYS ON MAY 10, 2027, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: APRIL 16, 2027 AT 1:00PM. SINCE THIS IS A BENCH TRIAL, JUDGE WILL SET A DEADLINE FOR A PRE-TRIAL BRIEF. ALL OTHER DATES WILL BE FORTHCOMING. ACCEPTED BY: DR TRANSACTION ID: 77313943
  29. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD
  30. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE HELD DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 15, 2025
  31. SCHEDULING ORDER
  32. SCHEDULING ORDER DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 17, 2025 4 DAY BENCH TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR 05-10-2027 AT 9:15 A.M.; PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 04-16-2027 AT 1:00 P.M. ACCEPTED BY: DR TRANSACTION ID: 77323130
  33. E-MAIL FILED
  34. E-MAIL FILED DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 17, 2026 EMAIL FROM YVONNE SAVILLE DATED JANUARY 15, 2026 INDICATING THAT CASE SETTLED WITH MEDIATION EFFORTS ACCEPTED BY: DR TRANSACTION ID: 78232828
  35. CONFIRMATION DISMISSAL LETTER
  36. CONFIRMATION OF DISMISSAL LETTER DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 17, 2026 THIS LETTER IS A CONFIRMATION THAT THE COURT HAS BEEN NOTIFIED BY COUNSEL THAT ALL PARTIES HAVE SETTLED THIS MATTER. IN ORDER FOR THE COURT TO CLOSE ITS FILE, A STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL MUST BE FILED BY THE PARTIES. FAILURE TO DO SO WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS WILL RESULT IN THE COURT DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. ACCEPTED BY: DR TRANSACTION ID: 78232889

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more