Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-23
Status NEW - NEW
Type Cr Personal Injury Auto
Docket 52 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Burgos, Cindy | Burgos, Cindy | Isaac, Christopher J | Ippoliti, Michael R
Defendant Salazar Quiroz, Patricia
Photo of Hon. New B

Judge

Hon. New B

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING PERS INJURY AUTO
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  6. LETTER
  7. STATUS CASE LETTER
  8. MOTION
  9. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  10. RESPONSE
  11. NOTICE
  12. SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL (SIGN)
  13. ORDER
  14. NOTICE
  15. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  16. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  17. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  18. ORDER
  19. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  20. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  21. SO NOTED
  22. ORDER
  23. ALIAS SUMMONS
  24. ALIAS PRAECIPE FILED
  25. ORDER
  26. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 22, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: HORTON, MONICA SO ORDERED (PLEASE WITHDRAW THE APPEARANCE OF ROBERT RANIERI,, ESQUIRE AND ENTER THE APPEARANCE OF SUSAN FLOOD, ESQUIRE AS COUNSEL OF RECORD FOR DEFENDANT) ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 77841945
  27. NOTICE
  28. NOTICE DATE DOCKETED: NOVEMBER 27, 2025 PLAINTIFF'S RE-NOTICE OF MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DECEMBER 17, 2025 ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 77877412
  29. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  30. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 13, 2025 LETTER TO JUDGE HORTON - PRO FORMA REQUEST TO CHANGE MOTION TO ENLARGE TO MOTION TO COMPEL INSURANCE COMPANY TO ACCEPT SERVICE ON BEHALF OF THEIR INSURED. PROPOSED ORDER - ENLARGEMENT OF TIME AND COMPEL INSURANCE COMPANY TO ACCEPT SERVICE. ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 77985503
  31. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  32. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 18, 2025 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME AND TO COMPEL DEFENDANT INSURANCE COMPANY TO ACCEPT SERVICE ON BEHALF OF THEIR INSURED HELD BEFORE JUDGE HORTON ON DECEMBER 17, 2025. ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 78020395
  33. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  34. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 19, 2025 PLAINTIFF'S LETTER TO COURT REGARDING DEADLINE ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 78034531
  35. ORDER
  36. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 31, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: HORTON, MONICA GRANTED (PLAINTIFF'S LETTER TO COURT REGARDING DEADLINE) ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 78087601
  37. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  38. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 8, 2026 PLAINTIFF'S PRO FORMA REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL SEVEN DAYS. ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 78146317
  39. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  40. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 14, 2026 LETTER TO THE JUDGE - WITHDRAWING PORTION OF MOTION FOR ALTERNATE SERVICE REVISED PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: TRANSACTION ID: 78198127

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more