Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-10-08
Status CSO - CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Type Cr Personal Injury Auto
Docket 81 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Strange, Dajah
Defendant Davis, Kevin|Lennon, Mary|Maichle, Edward|Maichle, Virginia|Glacier Insurance Co|Garrison Prprty & Cas Insur Co
Photo of Hon. Winston Patricia A

Judge

Hon. Winston Patricia A

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT ISSUED
  5. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  6. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  7. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  8. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  9. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  10. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  11. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  12. DISCOVERY
  13. DISCOVERY
  14. ANSWER & CROSSCLAIM
  15. ANSWER FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES
  16. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  17. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  18. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  19. ANSWER
  20. DISCOVERY
  21. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  22. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  23. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  24. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  25. SO NOTED
  26. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  27. ALIAS PRAECIPE FILED
  28. SO NOTED
  29. WRIT ISSUED
  30. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  31. MOTION
  32. ORDER
  33. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  34. PROPOSED ORDER
  35. EXHIBITS
  36. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  37. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  38. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  39. NOTICE
  40. NOTICE
  41. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  42. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  43. SO NOTED
  44. SO NOTED
  45. LETTER
  46. LETTER
  47. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  48. ANSWER
  49. ANSWER FORM 30 INTERROGATORIES
  50. NOTICE
  51. MOTION WITHDRAWN
  52. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  53. ALIAS PRAECIPE FILED
  54. ALIAS PRAECIPE FILED ON DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 8, 2026 ALIAS PRAECIPE - AS TO KEVIN DAVIS - LONG ARM ALIAS SUMMONS - AS TO KEVIN DAVIS - LONG ARM ACCEPTED BY: TG TRANSACTION ID: 78143449
  55. SO NOTED
  56. SO NOTED DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 9, 2026 ORDER SIGNED BY: WINSTON, PATRICIA A SO NOTED (LETTER TO THE COURT FROM JOELLE FLORAX, ESQ. RE NO OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS EDWARD MAICHLE AND VIRGINIA MAECHLE, AND REQUESTS TO BE EXCUSED FROM MOTION ORAL ARGUMENT) ACCEPTED BY: TG TRANSACTION ID: 78153384
  57. WRIT ISSUED
  58. WRIT(S) ISSUED ON DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 13, 2026 (1) WRIT ISSUED - SENT TO COUNSEL FOR SERVICE ON KEVIN DAVIS 1-12-26 ACCEPTED BY: TG TRANSACTION ID: 78184834
  59. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  60. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 22, 2026 MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST EDWARD AND VIRGINIA MAICHLE HELD WITH COMMISSIONER ACCEPTED BY: TG TRANSACTION ID: 78256204
  61. MOTION
  62. MOTION DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 24, 2026 MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR SERVICE NOTICE OF SERVICE PROPOSED ORDER ACCEPTED BY: TG TRANSACTION ID: 78268149

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix and motion outcomes. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more