Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-13
Status STAYED - STAYED
Type C 2 Ccld: Complex Com Lit Division
Docket 73 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Cft Clear Finance Technology | Cft Clear Finance Technology | Cft Clear Finance Technology | Powers, Elizabeth A | Schneider, Abraham C | Ali, Mutaz A
Defendant Fit Factory Usa Llc
Photo of Hon. Davis Eric M

Judge

Hon. Davis Eric M

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING CCLD
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. ALIAS PRAECIPE FILED
  5. WRIT ISSUED
  6. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT
  7. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT
  8. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT
  9. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT
  10. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT
  11. AMENDMENT TO THE COMPLAINT
  12. STIPULATION
  13. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  14. ORDER
  15. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  16. PRAECIPE FILED
  17. SUMMONS
  18. WRIT ISSUED
  19. STIPULATION
  20. ORDER
  21. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  22. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  23. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  24. ORDER
  25. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  26. ORDER
  27. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  28. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: APRIL 23, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: DAVIS, ERIC M SO ORDERED (STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO APRIL 30, 2025)- DAVIS, J. 04-22-25 ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76121127
  29. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED
  30. AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED DATE DOCKETED: MAY 1, 2025 AMENDED COMPLAINT EXHIBITS A-G TO AMENDED COMPLAINT REDLINE - EXHIBIT 1 - REDLINE OF AMENDED COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76177193
  31. PRAECIPE FILED
  32. PRAECIPE DATE DOCKETED: MAY 1, 2025 AMENDED PRAECIPE PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 5 & 10 OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76179192
  33. SUMMONS
  34. SUMMONS ON ELIZABETH A POWERS DATE DOCKETED: MAY 1, 2025 AMENDED SUMMONS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 5 & 10 OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76179192
  35. WRIT ISSUED
  36. WRIT(S) ISSUED ON DATE DOCKETED: MAY 2, 2025 (1) WRIT ISSUED FOR 3104 ON 05-01-25 ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76186856
  37. STIPULATION
  38. STIPULATION DATE DOCKETED: MAY 9, 2025 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT TO MAY 26, 2025 ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76235742
  39. ORDER
  40. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: MAY 14, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: DAVIS, ERIC M SO ORDERED (STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT TO MAY 26, 2025)- DAVIS, J. 05-13-25 ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76260723
  41. ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT
  42. ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT DATE DOCKETED: MAY 28, 2025 DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES DEFENDANTS' CASE INFORMATION STATEMENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76332339
  43. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  44. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING DATE DOCKETED: JULY 11, 2025
  45. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  46. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: JULY 17, 2025 LETTER TO THE HONORABLE ERIC M. DAVIS FROM LAUREN P. DELUCA REQUESTING A STAY PENDING SETTLEMENT ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76655298
  47. ORDER
  48. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: JULY 18, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: DAVIS, ERIC M GRANTED. PLEASE SEE COURT'S COMMENTS ON PAGE 2. (LETTER TO THE HONORABLE ERIC M. DAVIS FROM LAUREN P. DELUCA REQUESTING A STAY PENDING SETTLEMENT)- DAVIS, PJ. 07-17-25 ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76665967
  49. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  50. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 4, 2025 LETTER TO THE HONORABLE ERIC M. DAVIS FROM LAUREN P. DELUCA PROVIDING STATUS UPDATE OF STAY PENDING SETTLEMENT ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76981124
  51. ORDER
  52. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 9, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: DAVIS, ERIC M GRANTED (LETTER TO THE HONORABLE ERIC M. DAVIS FROM LAUREN P. DELUCA PROVIDING STATUS UPDATE OF STAY PENDING SETTLEMENT)- DAVIS, PJ. 09-05-25 ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 77005940
  53. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  54. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 21, 2025 LETTER TO THE HON. ERIC M. DAVIS FROM ELIZABETH A. POWERS, ESQ. PROVIDING AN UPDATED STATUS REPORT ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 77333855
  55. ORDER
  56. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 22, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: DAVIS, ERIC M GRANTED (LETTER TO THE HON. ERIC M. DAVIS FROM ELIZABETH A. POWERS, ESQ. PROVIDING AN UPDATED STATUS REPORT)- DAVIS, PJ. 10-21-25 ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 77408858

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more