Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-10
Status CSO - CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Type Cr Personal Injury Auto
Docket 49 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Nicolas, Wilbert
Defendant Bauerle, David L.
Photo of Hon. Wharton Ferris W

Judge

Hon. Wharton Ferris W

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. SCHEDULING ORDER
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. ENTRY OF APPEARANCE FILED
  6. ANSWER
  7. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  8. NOTICE SRV REQUEST ADMISSION
  9. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  10. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  11. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  12. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  13. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  14. SO NOTED
  15. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  16. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION
  17. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  18. LETTER
  19. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  20. NOTICE OF SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: MAY 10, 2025 DEFENDANT DAVID BAUERLE'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF: (1) DEFENDANTS RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS, AND (2) THIS NOTICE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: LR TRANSACTION ID: 76243743
  21. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING
  22. REFERRED TO CASE SCHEDULING DATE DOCKETED: MAY 15, 2025
  23. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  24. NOTICE OF SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: MAY 20, 2025 DEFENDANT DAVID BAUERLE'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF: (1) DEFENDANTS RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS INTERROGATORIES, (2) DEFENDANTS RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION, AND (3) THIS NOTICE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: LR TRANSACTION ID: 76296491
  25. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  26. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: JULY 23, 2025 LETTER TO THE COURT REQUESTING TELECONFERENCE TO ESTABLISH TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 76696773
  27. SO NOTED
  28. SO NOTED DATE DOCKETED: JULY 24, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: WHARTON, FERRIS W SO NOTED (LETTER TO THE COURT REQUESTING TELECONFERENCE TO ESTABLISH TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER) ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 76712607
  29. NOTICE OF SERVICE
  30. NOTICE OF SERVICE DATE DOCKETED: AUGUST 21, 2025 NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS ANSWERS TO DEFENDANTS INTERROGATORIES DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF AND PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO PLAINTIFF ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 76900857
  31. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION
  32. NOTICE OF DEPOSITION OF DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 23, 2025 DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF IN-PERSON DEPOSITION OF PLAINTIFF, WILBERT NICOLAS, ON DECEMBER 12, 2025 AT 10:00 A.M., IN THE LAW OFFICES OF PRATCHER KRAYER ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 77410852
  33. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW
  34. LETTER FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW DATE DOCKETED: OCTOBER 24, 2025 PLAINTIFF LETTER TO COURT REQUESTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 77421405
  35. LETTER
  36. LETTER DATE DOCKETED: DECEMBER 30, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: WHARTON, FERRIS W LETTER FROM JUDGE WHARTON TO COUNSEL SETTING SCHEDULING TELECONFERENCE FOR JANUARY 12, 2026 AT 2:00 P.M. ACCEPTED BY: TNW TRANSACTION ID: 78078217
  37. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  38. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: JANUARY 13, 2026 JUDICIAL ACTION FORM AS TO SCHEDULING CONFERENCE BEFORE WHARTON, J. ON 01-12-26; A TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER WILL BE ISSUED BY THE COURT. (SEE FORM FOR DATES) ACCEPTED BY: GP TRANSACTION ID: 78182810

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more