Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Kent Co

Court

Kent Co

Delaware

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-22
Status JUDGMENT - JUDGMENT
Type C 2 Ccld: Complex Com Lit Division
Docket 25 entries
Disposition Default judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Re Build Tekna, Llc | Re Build Tekna, Llc | Re Build Tekna, Llc | Biggs, Brian A | Gaul, Catherine A | Greene, Elizabeth C
Defendant Exro Technologies Usa Inc.
Photo of Hon. Davis Eric M

Judge

Hon. Davis Eric M

Kent County (DE)

Delaware

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. INIT FILING CCLD
  2. INITIAL COMPLAINT
  3. WRIT ISSUED
  4. WRIT RETURN (GENERIC)
  5. REDACTED VERSION FILED
  6. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  7. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  8. PROPOSED ORDER
  9. ORDER
  10. REDACTED VERSION DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 REDACTED COMPLAINT ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 77020092
  11. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
  12. MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT TO BE PRESENTED TO THE COURT ON SEPTEMBER 29, 2025 WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT APPENDIX A TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT WITH CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 77036740
  13. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM
  14. JUDICIAL ACTION FORM DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 SUPERIOR COURT PROCEEDING SHEET FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT, HEARD ON SEPTEMBER 29, 2025 ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 77187405
  15. PROPOSED ORDER
  16. PROPOSED ORDER SUBMITTED DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 PLAINTIFF'S [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 77190744
  17. ORDER
  18. ORDER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 ORDER SIGNED BY: DAVIS, ERIC M SO ORDERED. PLEASE READ COURT'S COMMENTS ON PAGE 2. (PLAINTIFF'S [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT)- DAVIS, PJ> 09-29-25 ACCEPTED BY: BB TRANSACTION ID: 77192783
  19. JUDGMENT BY ORDER
  20. JUDGMENT BY ORDER DATE DOCKETED: SEPTEMBER 30, 2025 JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AGAINST: EXRO TECHNOLOGIES USA INC. JUDGMENT AMOUNTS TO BE PAID AS FOLLOWS: TOTAL $1122206.30 INCLUDING (I) UNPAID INVOICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $897,691.83; (II) PRE-JUDGMENT INTEREST IN THE AMOUNT OF $180,973.39 CALCULATED THROUGH SEPTEMBER 29, 2025; AND (III) PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COURT COSTS IN THE AMOUNT OF $43,541.08.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more