Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Appeal Court

Court

Nevada Appeal Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-15
Status Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal General Proper Person
Docket 14 entries
Disposition an award of

Docket Entries

  1. Case Closed. Nos. 87677/88209. (COA)
  2. Filed Order Scheduling Oral Argument. This court has determined that oral argument may be of assistance in resolving these consolidated appeals. Accordingly, the matter is scheduled for oral argument on March 25, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. at the Thomas and Mack Moot Court Facility on the campus of the William S. Boyd School of Law in Las Vegas. The argument shall be limited to 30 minutes. Nos. 87677/88209. (COA)
  3. Oral argument held this day. Case submitted for decision before The Court of Appeals. Nos. 87677/88209. (SC)
  4. Filed Order Affirming in Part, and Reversing in Part (No. 87677-COA) and Reversing (No. 88209-COA) and Reversing (No. 88209-COA). "In Docket No. 87677-COA, we reverse the order imposing an award of attorney fees as sanctions against Goldberg, and in Docket No. 88209-COA, we reverse the order setting the amount of attorney fees awarded as sanctions." COA-BB/MG/DW. Nos. 87677/88209 (COA)
  5. Filed Respondent's Motion To Reissue Order As An Opinion. Nos. 87677-COA/88209-COA. (COA)
  6. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Appellant's petition for rehearing due: June 20, 2025. Nos. 87677-COA/88209-COA (COA)
  7. Filed Appellant's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel and for Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing Nos. 87677-COA/88209-COA (COA)
  8. Filed Order Denying Motion to Publish. This court entered an order resolving these consolidated appeals on May 22, 2025. Respondent subsequently moved to reissue the order as a published opinion. Having considered the motion, we conclude that publication is not warranted. Accordingly, we deny the motion. Nos. 87677/88209 (COA)
  9. Filed Respondent's Response To Appellant's Motion To Withdraw As Counsel Of Record And For Extension Of Time To File Petition For Rehearing. Nos. 87677/88209. (COA)
  10. Filed Appellant's Reply Brief on Appeal (Reply in Support of Motion to Withdraw and Extend Time). Nos. 87677-COA/88209-COA. (STRICKEN PER 7/3/25 ORDER). (COA)
  11. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient "Appellant's reply brief on Appeal." Corrected filing due: 7 days. Nos. 87677-COA/88209-COA (SC)
  12. Filed Appellant's Reply Brief on Appeal (Reply in Support of Motion to Withdraw and Extend Time). Nos. 87677/88209. (COA)
  13. Filed Order Regarding Motion. Counsel for appellant, Valerie Del Grasso, has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel for appellant and for a second extension of time for appellant to file a petition for rehearing. Respondent opposes the motion and Del Grasso has replied. Based on Del Grasso's representations of appellant's ongoing failure to communicate with her, Del Grasso's motion to withdraw as counsel is granted. The clerk shall remove Del Grasso as counsel of record for appellant. However, appellant's failure to communicate with counsel and pay for services does not constitute extraordinary and compelling circumstances warranting a second extension of time to file a petition for rehearing. Accordingly, the motion for an extension of time is denied. Given the denial of the extension motion, the time to file a petition for rehearing has now expired. Nos. 87677/88209 (COA)
  14. Transferred to Supreme Court. Nos. 87677/88209. (COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more