Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-09-11
Status Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal General Pro Bono Program
Docket 7 entries
Disposition dismiss

Docket Entries

  1. Case Closed. (COA)
  2. Filed Order Scheduling Oral Argument. This appeal has been scheduled for oral argument on May 29, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Carson City. The argument shall be limited to 30 minutes. (COA)
  3. Filed Appellant's Emergency Motion Under NRAP 27(e) to Vacate Oral Argument and Decide the Case on Briefs. (SC)
  4. Filed Order Granting Motion Emergency Motion Part. Appellant has filed an emergency motion to vacate oral argument in this matter and submit the matter for decision without oral argument. Cause appearing, the motion is granted to the extent it seeks to vacate the current oral argument date. Accordingly, the argument scheduled for May 29, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Carson City is vacated. Pending respondent's response to the motion, if any, this matter may be rescheduled for argument at a later date, or may be submitted for decision based upon the briefs, appendices, and papers filed herein. (COA)
  5. Filed Order. This court previously vacated the oral argument scheduled for May 29, 2025, at 2:00 p.m. in Carson City. As no party has requested that oral argument be rescheduled, this matter will be decided based on the briefs and appendices filed herein. (COA)
  6. Filed Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding. "REVERSE the district court's dismissal of the RLUIPA claim, AFFIRM the remainder of the district court's judgement, and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with this order." COA-BB/MG/DW. (COA)
  7. Transferred to Supreme Court. (COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.