Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Appeal Court

Court

Nevada Appeal Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2026-01-14
Status Disposition Filed
Type Civil Appeal Administrative Agency Proper Person
Docket 7 entries
Disposition order the judgment

Docket Entries

  1. Filed Order. Appellant has filed a pro se "Motion for Leave to File Petition for Rehearing NRAP Rule 40 and Motion to Submit Supplemental Authorities for PFR," as well as a "Motion to Submit Supplemental Authorities for PFR." Appellant has also submitted a petition for rehearing. The submitted petition for rehearing is deficient because it is not accompanied by the required certificate of compliance. Accordingly, the clerk shall return the petition for rehearing received on January 12, 2026, unfiled. Appellant's "Motion to Submit Supplemental Authorities" consists of legal argument, apparently in support of the petition for rehearing. To the extent appellant seeks to file a separate document in support of his petition for rehearing, the motion is denied. The "Motion for Leave to File Petition for Rehearing NRAP Rule 40 and Motion to Submit Supplemental Authorities for PFR" is granted to the following extent. Appellant shall have 28 days from the date of this order to file and serve an amended petition for rehearing that fully complies with the requirements of NRAP 40. Within the amended petition for rehearing, appellant may include citations to any authorities, and argument regarding those authorities, if deemed warranted. (COA)
  2. Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED."COA-BB/MG/DW. (COA)
  3. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Petition for Rehearing due: 01-6-2026 (COA)
  4. Filed Proper Person Motion for Extension of Time to File Petition for Rehearing Civil Appeals (First Request) NRAP 0 and NRAP Rule 26(b). (COA).
  5. Filed Order Granting Motion. Appellant's motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing is granted. Appellant shall have until February 6, 2026, to file and serve a petition for rehearing. (COA)
  6. Filed Proper Person (Motion for Leave to File Petition for Rehearing NRAP Rule 40 and Motion to Submit Supplemental Authorities for PFR). (COA)
  7. Filed Proper Person (Motion to Submit Supplemental Authorities for PFR). (COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more