Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Docket Entries
- Case Closed. (COA).
- Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." COA-BB/MG/DW. (COA)
- Transferred to Supreme Court.(COA)
- Case Closed.(COA)
- Transferred from Supreme Court. (COA).
- Filed Proper Person Petition for Rehearing. (COA)
- Filed Proper Person Motion for Stay of Ruling on Petition for Rehearing Pending Certification of NRAP 9(d) Statement. (COA)
- Filed Proper Person Expedited Motion to Direct District Court to Settle and Certify NRAP 9(c) Statement of Evidence. (STRICKEN PER ORDER FILED ON 3/25/25) (COA)
- Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Expedited Motion to Direct District Court to Settle and Certify. Corrected Motion due: 7 days from the date of this order. (COA)
- Filed Proper Person Expedited Motion to Direct District Court to Settle and Certify NRAP 9(c) Statement of Evidence. (COA)
- Filed Order Denying Rehearing. "Rehearing Denied." NRAP 40(c). FN1 [To the extent Vonseydewitz seeks to supplement the record on appeal to include an NRCP 9(c) statement, his request is untimely presented after the entry of our January 15, 2025, order of affirmance resolving this appeal. Cf. NRAP 40(c)(1) (providing that no point may be presented for the first time on rehearing); see also NRAP 9(c) (outlining the process for correcting the record on appeal); Carson Ready Mix, Inc. v. First Nat'l Bank of Nev., 97 Nev. 474, 476-77, 635 P.2d 276, 277-78 (1981) (holding that litigants must follow the appropriate procedure for ensuring a complete and accurate record when a recording does not exist). We therefore deny his February 21, 2025, motion to stay the resolution of this petition pending completion of an NRAP 9(c) statement and his March 25 motion for an order directing the district court to settle and certify an NRAP 9(c) statement.] COA-BB/MG/DW. (COA)
- Transferred to Supreme Court. (COA)
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In