Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Appeal Court

Court

Nevada Appeal Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-07
Status Case Closed
Type Criminal Appeal Other Direct
Docket 10 entries
Disposition order the judgment

Docket Entries

  1. Case Closed. (COA)
  2. Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED." COA-BB/MG/DW (COA)
  3. Filed Appellant's Petition for Rehearing. (COA)
  4. Appellant's Rehearing Filing Fee Waived. (COA)
  5. Filed Appellant's Motion for Permission to File - Supplement to Petition for Rehearing. (COA)
  6. Filed Appellant's Supplement to Petition for Rehearing. (STRICKEN PER ORDER FILED ON 4/25/25) (COA)
  7. Filed Respondent's Opposition to Motion to Supplement Petitioner's NRAP 40 Petition. (COA)
  8. Filed Appellant's Reply to the State's Opposition to Motion to Supplement Mark's NRAP 40 Petition; If Necessary, Mark's Request to Implement NRAP 2. (COA)
  9. Filed Order Denying Rehearing. "Rehearing Denied." NRAP 40(c). fn1[On March 26, 2025, Mark Anthony Gonzalez filed a motion to supplement his petition for rehearing and filed the supplement. Having reviewed the motion, the State's answer to the motion, and Gonzalez's reply, we deny Gonzalez's motion to supplement. See NRAP 40(c) (limiting the time for filing a petition for rehearing); see also NRAP 2 (stating it is within this court's discretion to suspend any provision of the rules of appellate procedure). Accordingly, the clerk shall strike the supplement to the petition for rehearing filed on March 26, 2025.] COA-BB/MG/DW (COA)
  10. Transferred to Supreme Court. (COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more