Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of San Joaquin County

Court

San Joaquin County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-08-12
Status Pending
Type Unlimited Civil Wrongful Termination
Docket 30 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Luis, Morgan
Defendant Durham, Donald|Estrada, Alfredo|Ingrum, David|The Woodshaper, A Corporation
Photo of Hon. Zendejas, Esmeralda

Judge

Hon. Zendejas, Esmeralda

San Joaquin County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Request for Dismissal - Participant entered as to Alfredo Estrada.
  2. Notice of Case Assignment and Scheduling Information.
  3. Attorney, Gregory A. Douglas, retained for Morgan Luis .
  4. Payment received by Morgan Luis in the amount of $435.00. Receipt number 1062342.
  5. Civil Case Cover Sheet filed by Luis, Morgan.
  6. Complaint Unlimited Civil (over $35,000) filed by Luis, Morgan.
  7. Summons issued and filed.
  8. Hearing regarding: Case Management Conference , set for 02/10/2026 at 8:45 AM before Hon. Blanca Banuelos in Department 10B.
  9. Declaration of prejudice pursuant to 170.6 CCP as to Judge Banuelos filed by Plaintiff.
  10. Declaration of Prejudice/ Peremptory Challenge Pursuant to CCP 170.6 GRANTED.
  11. Esmeralda Zendejas Assigned.
  12. Hearing Result: Reassigned
  13. Hearing regarding: Case Management Conference , set for 02/10/2025 at 8:45 AM before Hon. Esmeralda Zendejas in Department 11A.
  14. Hearing Result: Vacated
  15. Hearing regarding: Case Management Conference , set for 02/10/2026 at 8:45 AM before Hon. Esmeralda Zendejas in Department 11A.
  16. Proof of Service of Summons as to The Woodshaper, a corporation served on 09/05/2025 by Personal Service. $135.00.
  17. Proof of Service of Summons as to David Ingrum served on 09/05/2025 by Personal Service. $50.00.
  18. Payment received by a The Woodshaper in the amount of $435.00. Receipt number 1082056.
  19. Declaration of Derek J. Haynes in Support of Defendant the Woodshaper's Good Faith Attempt to Meet and Confer Regarding Pleading (CCP 430-41) filed by The Woodshaper, a corporation.
  20. Attorney, Derek J. Haynes, retained for The Woodshaper, a corporation .
  21. First Amended Complaint filed by Luis, Morgan.
  22. Answer to Amended Complaint filed by The Woodshaper, a corporation.
  23. Case Management Statement filed by The Woodshaper, a corporation.
  24. Payment received by a The Woodshaper in the amount of $150.00. Receipt number 1118949.
  25. Case Management Statement filed by Luis, Morgan.
  26. Minutes finalized for Case Management Conference held on 02/10/2026 08:45 AM .
  27. Hearing re: Case Management Conference held on February 10, 2026.
  28. Hearing regarding: CMC: Further Case Management Conference , set for 05/12/2026 at 8:45 AM before Hon. Esmeralda Zendejas in Department 11A.
  29. Case Management Statement filed by Luis, Morgan.
  30. Request for Dismissal *without Prejudice (as to participant only) filed by Luis, Morgan.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more