Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2023-09-06
Status Closed
Type Par Partition, G.l. Chapter 241
Docket 28 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Coleman, Jocelyn
Defendant Freni, Kirsten L.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Stipulation of Dismissal - Mass.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)(ii)
  2. Case assigned to the Fast Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
  3. Land Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 443824 Date: 09/06/2023
  4. Land Court surcharge Receipt: 443824 Date: 09/06/2023
  5. Land Court summons Receipt: 443824 Date: 09/06/2023
  6. Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  7. The case has been assigned to the F Track. Notice sent. Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Notice of Judge and Track Assignment was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: E Steven Coren, Esq. [email protected] Sent On: 10/30/2023 15:48:32
  8. Event Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Case Management Conference Date: 11/30/2023 Time: 09:00 AM
  9. Summons returned to Court with service on Kirsten L. Freni filed. Served at their last and usual place of abode on November 9, 2023.
  10. Appearance of David E Belfort, Esq. for Kirsten L. Freni, filed
  11. Appearance of Nafisa M Bohra, Esq. for Kirsten L. Freni, filed
  12. Joint Statement of Conference, filed.
  13. Event Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 11/30/2023 09:00 AM Has been: Held via video. Early intervention event held. Attorney E. Steven Coren appeared for the plaintiff. Attorney David Belfort appeared for the defendant. This is an action for partition pursuant to G. L. c. 241. The court inquired as to whether the appointment of a commissioner or pursuing mediation would be appropriate at this stage of the case. Attorney Belfort explained that both parties wish to sell the property and agree as to their respective ownership shares, but merely dispute how to divide the proceeds, and he stated that the defendant is open to mediation. Attorney Coren agreed with Attorney Belfort as to his characterization of the dispute and agreed to mediation. Following discussion, the court ordered the parties to attend ADR screening and continued the case management conference to January 12, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. Email notice to: Attorney Steven Coren and Attorney David Belfort. Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding
  14. Notice of Docket Entry: Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: E Steven Coren, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: David E Belfort, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Nafisa M Bohra, Esq. [email protected]
  15. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Early Intervention Event held. Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T.
  16. Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Status Conference VIA ZOOM Date: 01/12/2024 Time: 02:00 PM Email notice to: Attorney E. Steven Coren; Attorney David E. Belfort; and Attorney Nafisa M. Bohra.
  17. Order Referring Case to Dispute Resolution Screening Session, issued. (Copies emailed to Attorneys E Steven Coren, David Belfort, and Nafisa Bohra) Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T.
  18. Plaintiff's Assented To Motion to Reschedule REBA Screening Deadline, filed.
  19. Certificate of Service, filed.
  20. December 18, 2023. Plaintiff's Assented To Motion to Reschedule REBA Screening Deadline ALLOWED. The new deadline for mediation screening is January 31, 2024, and the Status Conference on January 12, 2024 will be continued. (Smith, J.). Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: E Steven Coren, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: David E Belfort, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Nafisa M Bohra, Esq. [email protected] Sent On: 12/18/2023 15:43:51
  21. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 01/12/2024 02:00 PM Has been: Continued For the following reason: Request of Plaintiff(s) Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding
  22. Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Status Conference Date: 02/28/2024 Time: 09:00 AM
  23. ADR Report of REBA: Parties will attend Mandatory Mediation Screening on January 18, 2024.
  24. ADR Report of REBA: Parties will mediate with Judge Mark Mason on Tuesday, March 26, 2024.
  25. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 02/28/2024 09:00 AM Has been: Continued Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding
  26. Notice of Docket Entry: Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: E Steven Coren, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: David E Belfort, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Nafisa M Bohra, Esq. [email protected] Sent On: 02/16/2024 10:41:22
  27. ADR Report of REBA: Parties mediated with Hon. Mark D. Mason (ret.) on March 26, 2024 and settled.
  28. Joint Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, filed.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more