Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Hancock Co

Court

Hancock Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-16
Status CLOSED
Type Civil
Docket 29 entries
Disposition dism lack of speedy trial
Photo of Hon. Starn Jonathan P

Judge

Hon. Starn Jonathan P

Hancock County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DEP LESS COSTS PAID TO FINDLAY CITIZENS FOR A SAFE CITY Check issued: 01/06/2026 Check #105761 $14.00 Payable to: FINDLAY CITIZENS FOR A SAFE CITY
  2. DEPOSIT Receipt: 278015 Date: 06/16/2025
  3. VERIFIED COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER FILED Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  4. MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER FILED Attorney: PRO SE
  5. PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE FILED
  6. E-JUDGMENT ENTRY 06/18/2025 10:25 AM Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  7. VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER FILED Attorney: PRO SE
  8. PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE FILED Attorney: PRO SE
  9. E-JUDGMENT ENTRY (THE VERIFIED AMENDED COMPLAINT THE REQUEST FOR A TRO IS OVERRULED) FILED 07/01/2025 11:50 AM Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  10. E-JUDGMENT ENTRY (PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 5, 2025 TO FILE AN APPROPRIATE PRAECIPE IN ORDER TO BEGIN THE PROCESS OF PERFECTING SERVICE IN THIS MATTER) FILED 08/20/2025 08:25 AM Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  11. PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE FILED
  12. CERTIFIED COPY OF COMPLAINT ALONG WITH SUMMONS ISSUED (n)SUMMONS Sent On: 09/03/2025 16:39:59 Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  13. CERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED Issue Date: 09/03/2025 Service: SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Method: SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAILER Cost Per: 14.0000 CITY OF FINDLAY OHIO DEFAULT ADDRESS 318 DORNEY PLAZA FINDLAY, OH 45840 Tracking Number: 9414726699042239755497 MAYOR CHRISTINA MURYN DEFAULT ADDRESS IN HER OFFICAL CAPACITY 318 DORNEY PLAZA FINDLAY, OH 45840 Tracking Number: 9414726699042239755503 ROB MARTIN DEFAULT ADDRESS SAFETY-SERVICE DIRECTOR 318 DORNEY PLAZA ROOM 310 FINDLAY, OH 45840 Tracking Number: 9414726699042239755510 CITY COUNCIL OF FINDLAY DEFAULT ADDRESS C/O CLERK OF COUNCIL 318 DORNEY PLAZA FINDLAY, OH 45840 Tracking Number: 9414726699042239755527 Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  14. SERVICE SUCCESSFUL Method : SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAILER Issued : 09/03/2025 Service : SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Served : 09/08/2025 Return : 09/11/2025 on : CITY OF FINDLAY OHIO Signed By : JACLYN HOHMAN Reason : SUCCESSFUL Comment : Tracking #: 9414726699042239755497
  15. SERVICE SUCCESSFUL Method : SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAILER Issued : 09/03/2025 Service : SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Served : 09/08/2025 Return : 09/11/2025 on : MURYN, MAYOR CHRISTINA Signed By : JACLYN HOHMAN Reason : SUCCESSFUL Comment : Tracking #: 9414726699042239755503
  16. SERVICE SUCCESSFUL Method : SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAILER Issued : 09/03/2025 Service : SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Served : 09/08/2025 Return : 09/11/2025 on : MARTIN, ROB Signed By : JACLYN HOHMAN Reason : SUCCESSFUL Comment : Tracking #: 9414726699042239755510
  17. SERVICE SUCCESSFUL Method : SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAILER Issued : 09/03/2025 Service : SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT Served : 09/08/2025 Return : 09/11/2025 on : CITY COUNCIL OF FINDLAY Signed By : JACLYN HOHMAN Reason : SUCCESSFUL Comment : Tracking #: 9414726699042239755527
  18. E_NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME eFiled: 09/18/2025 02:40 PM Attorney: SKOW, SARAH K
  19. E-JUDGMENT ENTRY (THE DEFENDANTS ARE GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME, THROUGH AND INCLUDING OCTOBER 3, 2025 WITHIN WHICH TO MOVE, PLEAD, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT) FILED 09/23/2025 08:41 AM Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  20. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT FILED 09/29/2025 04:50 PM Attorney: SKOW, SARAH K
  21. E-JUDGMENT ENTRY (PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE 28 DAYS TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION AND THE DEFENDANTS' SHALL HAVE 7 DAYS TO FILE ANY REPLY) FILED 10/01/2025 11:52 AM Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  22. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FILED Attorney: PRO SE
  23. PRAECIPE FOR SERVICE FILED
  24. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  25. ORDINARY MAIL ISSUED Issue Date: 10/31/2025 Service: MOTION Method: ORDINARY MAIL Cost Per: 3.0000 SARAH K SKOW BUSINESS ADDRESS 900 ADAMS STREET TOLEDO, OH 43604 Tracking Number: 000005450 Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  26. DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT FILED eFiled: 11/17/2025 04:06 PM Attorney: SKOW, SARAH K
  27. E-ORDER (MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED AND THIS MATTER IS DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE)FILED 11/18/2025 02:30 PM Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  28. MICROFILMING FEE Receipt: 281674 Date: 12/30/2025
  29. COST COMPLETED. TOTAL COSTS: $134.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more