Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-10-06
Status Briefing Reinstated
Type Civil Appeal Administrative Agency General
Docket 25 entries
Photo of Hon. Lychuk, Paul

Judge

Hon. Lychuk, Paul

Nevada Supreme Court (NV)

Nevada

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. Filed Respondent's Notice of Proof of Service of Transcript Pursuant to NRAP 9(7). (SC)
  2. Filed Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (SC)
  3. Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. No action will be taken on this matter until filing fee is paid. Due Date: 7 days. (SC)
  4. Justice Linda Bell disqualified from participation in this matter. Disqualification Reason: Voluntary Recusal
  5. E-Payment $250.00 from Matthew W. Smith. (SC)
  6. Issued Notice of Referral to Settlement Program. This appeal may be assigned to the settlement program. Timelines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs are stayed. Docketing statement due: 21 days. (SC)
  7. Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Issued Assignment Notice to NRAP 16 Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Paul S. Lychuk. (SC)
  8. Filed ECAR/Other. The initial premediation conference convened on October 21, 2025, and will reconvene on December 5, 2025. The parties have agreed to further discuss the viability of the case for mediation under the program after submitting their respective Confidential Settlement briefs by December 4, 2025. (SC)
  9. Issued Notice to File Docketing Statement. Due date: 7 days. (SC)
  10. Filed Appellant's Docketing Statement. (SC)
  11. Filed ECAR/Other. The initial premediation conference reconvened on December 5, 2025, and will reconvene on December 15, 2025. The parties have agreed to further discuss the viability of the case for mediation under the program at that time and may supplement their respective Confidential Settlement briefs for the December 15, 2025 premediation discussion. (SC)
  12. Filed ECAR/Other. The parties have agreed to further discuss the viability of the case for mediation under the program on February 10, 2026. (SC)
  13. Filed Respondents' Notice of Appearance for Jason Mills. (SC)
  14. Filed Appellant's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. (STRICKEN PER 02/11/26 ORDER). (SC)
  15. Filed ECAR/Not Appropriate for Settlement Program. This case is not appropriate for mediation. (SC)
  16. Filed Order Removing From Settlement Program/Briefing Reinstated. This appeal is removed from the settlement program. Appellant(s): 14 days transcript request; 120 days opening brief. (SC)
  17. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Appellants' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. Corrected motion due: 7 days. (SC)
  18. Filed Appellants' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. (SC)
  19. Filed Appellants' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. (SC)
  20. Filed Appellant's Motion to Redact. (SC)
  21. Filed Respondent's Opposition to Appellants' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. (SC)
  22. Filed Appellant's Certificate of No Transcript Request. (SC)
  23. Filed Respondent's Notice of Proof of Service of Transcript Pursuant to NRAP 9(7)(REJECTED PER NOTICE FILED ON 03/03/2026). (SC)
  24. Filed Appellants' Reply in Support of Appellants' Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. (SC)
  25. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document. (Respondent's Notice of Proof of Service of Transcript Pursuant to NRAP 9(7). (SC)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more