Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Supreme Court

Court

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-10-10
Status To Screening
Type Original Proceeding Civil Proper Person Writ Petition
Docket 26 entries

Docket Entries

  1. Filed Petitioner's Reply Brief in Support of his Petition for Writ of Mandamus or, in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition (COA)
  2. Filed Proper Person Petition for Writ of Mandamus or, Alternatively, Prohibition. (TRANSFERRED FROM SUPREME COURT PER NOTICE). (COA)
  3. Filed Proper Person Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus/Prohibition - Index. (TRANSFERRED FROM SUPREME COURT PER NOTICE). (COA)
  4. Filed Proper Person Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus/Prohibition - Volume 1 of 3. (TRANSFERRED FROM SUPREME COURT PER NOTICE). (COA)
  5. Filed Proper Person Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus/Prohibition - Volume 2 of 3. (TRANSFERRED FROM SUPREME COURT PER NOTICE). (COA)
  6. Filed Proper Person Appendix to Petition for Writ of Mandamus/Prohibition - Volume 3 of 3. (TRANSFERRED FROM SUPREME COURT PER NOTICE). (COA)
  7. Filed Proper Person Letter to Clerk of the Court. RE: Emergency Motion for Stay under NRAP 27(c). (TRANSFERRED FROM SUPREME COURT PER NOTICE). (COA)
  8. Filed Proper Person Emergency Motion for Stay under NRAP 27(e). (TRANSFERRED FROM SUPREME COURT PER NOTICE). (COA)
  9. Filed Order Granting Stay and Directing Answer. Having considered the motion, petition, and other documents on file before this court, and the relevant NRAP 8(c) factors, we conclude that a stay is appropriate. We therefore stay enforcement of the district court's August 7, 2025, and September 17, 2025, orders, pending further order of this court. Additionally, it appears that an answer may assist this court in resolving this matter. Therefore, real parties in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 14 days from the date of this order to file and serve an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. NRAP 21(b)(1). Petitioner shall have 7 days from service of the answer to file and serve any reply. (COA)
  10. Filed Order Granting Extension Per Telephonic Request. Real Party in Interest's Answer to the Petition for Writ due: November 17, 2025. (COA).
  11. Filed Real Parties in Interest's Appendix - Volume I (STRICKEN PER 11/19/25 ORDER). (SC)
  12. Filed Real Parties in Interest's Appendix - Volume II (STRICKEN PER 11/19/25 ORDER). (SC)
  13. Filed Real Parties in Interest's Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Or, Alternatively, a Writ of Prohibition (STRICKEN PER 11/19/25 ORDER). (SC)
  14. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus . Corrected answer due: 14 days. (SC)
  15. Filed Real Parties in Interest's Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus Or, Alternatively, a Writ of Prohibition(COA)
  16. Filed Real Parties in Interest's Index of Appendixes Volumes I-II(COA)
  17. Filed Real Parties In Interest's Appendix - Volume I (STRICKEN PER 12/19/25 ORDER). (COA)
  18. Filed Real Parties In Interest's Appendix - Volume II (STRICKEN PER 12/19/25 ORDER). (COA)
  19. Filed Petitioner's Reply Brief in Support of His Petition for Writ of Mandamus or, in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition (REJECTED PER NOTICE ISSUE ON 12-11-2025) (SC)
  20. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Volumes I-II of the appendix Corrected volumes I-II due 14 days. (COA)
  21. Issued Notice of Rejection of Filed Document(Petitioner's Reply Brief in Support of His Petition for Writ of Mandamus or, in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition) (COA)
  22. Filed Real Parties in Interest Chronological and Alphabetical Index (SC)
  23. Filed Real Parties in Interest's Appendix - Volume I (COA)
  24. Filed Real Parties in Interest's Appendix - Volume II (COA)
  25. Filed Real Parties in Interest's Appendix - Volume III (COA)
  26. Filed Real Parties in Interest's Appendix - Volume IV (COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more