Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Travis County

Court

Travis County

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-08
Status Open
Type Defamation
Docket 54 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Giles, Veronica
Defendant Bryan Snoddy Director Of The Tecas Workforce Commission Civil Rights Division
Photo of Hon. 459 Th, District Court

Judge

Hon. 459 Th, District Court

Travis County

Texas

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. RESPONSE TWC DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL Party: Defendant BRYAN SNODDY DIRECTOR OF THE TECAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION; Defendant EDWARD SERNA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION; Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  3. EXECUTED SERVICE EXECUTED SERVICE- TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION AOS
  5. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANT BRYAN SNODDY S ORIGINAL ANSWER Party: Defendant BRYAN SNODDY DIRECTOR OF THE TECAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  7. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANT EDWARD SERNA S ORIGINAL ANSWER Party: Defendant EDWARD SERNA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  9. ORIGINAL ANSWER/WAIVER DEFENDANT THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION S ORIGINAL ANSWER AND JURY DEMAND Party: Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  11. MOTION DEFENDANT TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT EDWARD SERNA PURSUANT TO TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES OF CODE SECTION 101.106(E) AND MOTION TO AMEND STYLE OF THE CASE Party: Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  13. MOTION DEFENDANT TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT BRYAN SNODDY PURSUANT TO TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE AND REMEDIES OF CODE SECTION 101.106(E) AND MOTION TO AMEND STYLE OF THE CASE Party: Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  15. RESPONSE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT BRYAN SNODDY Party: Plaintiff GILES, VERONICA
  17. RESPONSE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT BRYAN SNODDY Party: Plaintiff GILES, VERONICA
  19. OTHER/NOTICE LETTER WITH EXHIBITS ATTACHED
  21. MOTION EMERGENCY MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Party: Plaintiff GILES, VERONICA
  23. RESPONSE DEFENDANT TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSIONS'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Party: Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  25. JUDGMENT NOTICE MAILED
  27. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE GRANTED (OCA) (Judicial Officer: SOIFER, JAN) ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE
  29. OTHER/NOTICE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED PETITION AND REQUEST FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Party: Plaintiff GILES, VERONICA
  31. OTHER/NOTICE VACATION LETTER-DATES AUGUST 19TH - AUGUST 27, 2025 - KANON BERNARD LILLEMON
  33. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF UNAVILABILITY
  35. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING ON DEFENDANT TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION S MOTION TO SET 91a. Party: Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  37. MOTION MOTION TO SET HEARING ON DEFENDANT THE TEXAS WORKFORCE CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 91a Party: Defendant BRYAN SNODDY DIRECTOR OF THE TECAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION; Defendant EDWARD SERNA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION; Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  38. MOTION DEFENDANT THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULE 91a. Party: Defendant BRYAN SNODDY DIRECTOR OF THE TECAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION; Defendant EDWARD SERNA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION; Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  39. OTHER/NOTICE PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS
  40. PLEADING PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED PETITION AND REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO ADD TO FILE TO THE HONORABLE COURT Party: Plaintiff GILES, VERONICA
  41. RESPONSE PLAINTIFF'S SUPPLEMENTAL AMENDMENT TO BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS Party: Plaintiff GILES, VERONICA
  42. MOTION TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Party: Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  43. RESPONSE PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE Party: Plaintiff GILES, VERONICA
  44. ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE GRANTED (OCA) (Judicial Officer: HEXSEL, MARIA CANTU) ORDER REGARDING THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION S MOTION TO CONTINUE
  45. JUDGMENT NOTICE MAILED
  46. MOTION DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL Party: Defendant BRYAN SNODDY DIRECTOR OF THE TECAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION; Defendant EDWARD SERNA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION; Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  47. OTHER/NOTICE VACATION LETTER
  48. MOTION PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF LEVEL 3 DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN Party: Plaintiff GILES, VERONICA
  49. OTHER/NOTICE NOTICE OF HEARING
  50. RESPONSE TWC DEFENDANTS PLEA TO THE JURISDICTION AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF S SECOND AMENDED PETITION Party: Defendant TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION
  51. OTHER/NOTICE VACATION LETTER
  52. OTHER/NOTICE FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
  53. OTHER/NOTICE SECOND AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
  54. MOTION PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF FINAL INVESTIGATIVE REPORT, OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY, AND RREQUEST FOR SHOW CAUSE ORDER & PRE-HERING PRODUCTION DEADLINE

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more