Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2022-12-12
Status Closed
Type Eqa Equitable Action Involving Any Right, Title Or Interest In Land, G.l. Chapter 185, 1 (k)
Docket 21 entries
Disposition judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Rocket Mortgage, Llc F/k/a Quicken Loans, Llc F/k/a Quicken Loans Inc.
Defendant Joanne Feldman A/k/a Joanne H. Feldman

Docket Entries

  1. Notice of Docket Entry: Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Paul G Manning, Jr., Esq. [email protected] Interested Party: Sara Spooner [email protected] Sent On: 07/03/2023 12:22:48
  2. Case assigned to the Average Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
  3. Land Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 436595 Date: 12/12/2022
  4. Land Court surcharge Receipt: 436595 Date: 12/12/2022
  5. Land Court summons Receipt: 436595 Date: 12/12/2022
  6. Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  7. Summons returned to Court with service on Joanne Feldman a/k/a Joanne H. Feldman filed. Delivered in hand on January 5, 2023
  8. The case has been assigned to the A Track. Notice sent. Notice of Judge and Track Assignment was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Paul G Manning, Jr., Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Joanne Feldman a/k/a Joanne H. Feldman No addresses available Sent On: 02/08/2023 10:50:15
  9. Event Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Case Management Conference Date: 02/27/2023 Time: 09:00 AM
  10. Case Management Conference Statement, filed (by email).
  11. Event Resulted: Case Management Conference scheduled on: 02/27/2023 09:00 AM Has been: Held via video Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding February 27, 2023. Case management conference held via videoconference. Early intervention event held. Attorney Paul Manning appeared for the plaintiff. Ms. Sara Spooner appeared on behalf of defendant Joanne Feldman. Ms. Spooner was appointed as guardian for defendant Joanne Feldman by the Essex Probate Court, however Ms. Spooner is not able to act on behalf of Ms. Feldman in this case. Ms. Spooner is currently petitioning for a conservatorship for Ms. Feldman, which would allow Ms. Spooner to act on behalf of Ms. Feldman in this case. Ms. Spooner indicated that the hearing date for her petition for conservatorship will likely be in mid to late May. Following the discussion of defendant Feldman's legal status, Attorney Manning informed the court that he intends to pursue settlement discussions in this case. The purpose of this action is to change the legal description of the property, something which Attorney Manning argues will be necessary regardless of what the defendant ultimately does with the property. Following discussion, the court scheduled a status conference for June 5, 2023 at 9:30am, in the hopes that Ms. Spooner's guardianship appointment will have been accomplished by then. (Smith, J.).
  12. Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Status Conference Date: 06/05/2023 Time: 09:30 AM
  13. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 06/05/2023 09:30 AM Has been: Held via video. Attorney Paul Manning appeared on behalf of the plaintiff. Sara Spooner appeared for Joanne Feldman. Ms. Spooner was previously appointed as the guardian ad litem for the defendant. She informed the court that, since the initial case management conference, she has been appointed by the Probate and Family Court for Essex County as the temporary conservator for the defendant. The parties are discussing a resolution now that Ms. Spooner can act as the temporary conservator. The court scheduled a further status conference for June 29, 2023 at 9:45 am. Email notice to: Attorney Paul Manning and Sara Spooner. Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding
  14. Notice of Docket Entry: Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Paul G Manning, Jr., Esq. [email protected] Interested Party: Sara Spooner [email protected]
  15. Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Status Conference VIA ZOOM Date: 06/29/2023 Time: 09:45 AM Email notice to: Attorney Paul Manning and Sara Spooner.
  16. Agreement for Judgment and PROPOSED Judgment, filed.
  17. Plaintiff's Motion to Approve Agreement for Judgment and to Enter Judgment, filed.
  18. Plaintiff's Motion to Approve Agreement for Judgment and to Enter Judgment, APPROVED. Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T.
  19. Judgment, entered (Copies emailed to Attorney Paul Manning and Pro Se Interested Party Sara Spooner) Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T.
  20. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 06/29/2023 09:45 AM Has been: Held via video Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding June 29, 2023. Status conference held via videoconference. Attorney Paul Manning appeared for the plaintiff. Sara Spooner, conservator for Joanne Feldman, also appeared. Prior to this status conference, the court received the parties' motion to approve an agreement for judgment. The court informed the parties that it would review the motion carefully and reach out to the parties if additional input is necessary. Otherwise, the court anticipates signing an order to approve the agreement for judgment by the end of the week. (Smith, J.).
  21. Agreement for Judgment approved by the Court.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more