Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-10-16
Status Case Closed
Type Civil Appeal Family Law Proper Person
Docket 7 entries
Disposition affirmance

Docket Entries

  1. Case Closed. (COA)
  2. Filed Proper Person Emergency Motion for Stay of Family Court Order and for Temporary Injunctive Relief to Preserve Subject Property (STRICKEN PER 7/15/25 ORDER). (COA)
  3. Filed Order Striking Deficient Document. Order Striking Deficient Emergency Motion for Stay of Family Court Order and for Temporary Injunctive Relief to Preserve Subject Property. Corrected Motion due: 7 days. (COA)
  4. Filed Proper Person Emergency Motion for Stay of Family Court Order and for Temporary Injunctive Relief to Preserve Subject Property. (COA)
  5. Filed Order Denying Stay. We deny the request for stay at this time. COA-BB/MG/DW. (COA)
  6. Filed Order of Affirmance. "We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Larson's motions to set aside the stipulated decree. We conclude relief is unwarranted based on this argument because Larson has not demonstrated that any alleged bias was based on knowledge acquired outside of the proceedings, and the challenged decision does not otherwise reflect "a deep-seated favoritism or antagonism that would make fair judgment impossible.'" COA-BB/MG/DW. (COA)
  7. Transferred to Supreme Court. (COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.