Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Nevada Appeal Court

Court

Nevada Appeal Court

Nevada

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-08
Status Case Closed
Type Original Proceeding Civil Mandamus
Docket 16 entries
Disposition award of

Docket Entries

  1. Case Closed. (COA)
  2. Filed Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus under NRAP 21(a)(6) and NRAP 27(e). (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 03/12/25 NOTICE) (COA)
  3. Filed Appendix to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus - Index. (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 03/12/25 NOTICE) (COA)
  4. Filed Appendix to Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 03/12/25 NOTICE) (COA)
  5. Filed Errata to Petitioner's Appendix Volume 1. (TRANSFERRED FROM THE SUPREME COURT PER 03/12/25 NOTICE) (COA)
  6. Filed Order Directing Answer to Petition. Answer due: March 28, 2025. Petitioner shall have seven days from the date the answer is served to file and serve any reply. (COA)
  7. Filed Real Party in Interest's Appendix (COA)
  8. Filed answer to Emergency Petition for Writ Mandamus Under NRAP 21(A)(6) and NRAP 27(e)(COA)
  9. Filed Real Party in Interest Chronological and Alphabetical Index (COA)
  10. Filed Reply in Support of Emergency Petition for Writ Mandamus Under NRAP 21(a)(6) and NRAP 27(e) Immediate Action Requested.(SC)
  11. Filed Order Granting Petition for Writ of Mandamus. "We grant the petition as to this issue and direct that the clerk of this court shall issue a writ of mandamus directing the district court to (1) revisit the temporary award of sole physical custody to Kimberly in accordance with the guidance set forth in this order, (2) immediately schedule this matter for a trial for the purposes of finally resolving the issue of child custody, and conduct an evidentiary hearing for temporary custody if there will be any significant delay in conducting the trial for final custody, and (3) if the district court intends to require Kasey to undergo a psychological evaluation before finally resolving the issue of child custody, it must enter an order requiring such an examination that complies with the requirements of NRCP 16.22. COA-BB/MG/DW. (COA)
  12. Issued Writ with letter. Original and one copy of writ and copy of the order mailed to Hannah E. Winston (Robison, Sharp, Sullivan & Brust) for service upon Judge Bridget E. Robb. (COA)
  13. Filed Petitioner's Motion to Reissue Order as Published Opinion(SC)
  14. Filed Returned Writ. Original Writ returned. Served on Judge Robb on June 11, 2025. (COA).
  15. Filed Order Denying Motion to Publish. Having considered the motion, we conclude that publication is not warranted. See NRAP 36(e)(4). Accordingly, we deny the motion. (COA)
  16. Transferred to Supreme Court. (COA)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more