Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Fresno County

Court

Fresno County

California

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-06
Status Judgment
Type Petition To Establish Parental
Docket 70 entries
Disposition default

Parties

Plaintiff Carmona, Ignacio
Defendant Hernandez, Navidad
Photo of Hon. Judicial Officer vasquez, Mary

Judge

Hon. Judicial Officer vasquez, Mary

Fresno County (CA)

California

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Withdraw of Attorney Comment Atty Withdrawing: Carey Haydon
  2. Summons issued and filed
  3. Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act
  4. Declaration Filed Comment Points and Authorities in Support of Petitioner's Request to Establish Paternity, for Custody and Visitation
  5. Initial OSC/Motion - Re: Custody/Visitation Comment Hrg: Time: 8:30am Dept. 203
  6. Memorandum of Points and Authorities
  7. Proof of Service of Summons
  8. Substitution of Attorney Comment Old Atty: pro-per New Atty: Carey Haydon
  9. Responsive Declaration Comment to RFO HRG D203
  10. Proof of Service Comment Electronic
  11. Notice Filed Comment Notice of Association of Counsel: Rosemarie E Rusca
  12. Declaration Filed Comment in Reply to RESP'S Responsive Declaration to RFO
  13. Proof of Service Comment Electronic
  14. Initial OSC/Motion Original Type Initial OSC/Motion Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Hearing Time 8:30 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment cc,cv, determination of petitioners parental relationship - set by Atty Nilan
  15. Appeared in Person Comment Attorney R. E. Rusca
  16. Interpreter appearing with Petitioner
  17. Court orders Comment The matter is continued to July 18, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 203.
  18. Court orders Comment Supplemental briefings shall be filed and served no later than July 16, 2025.
  19. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed Comment Attorney Rusca
  20. Document filed Comment Petitioner's Initial OSC/Motion Brief
  21. Proof of Service by Mail Comment Proof of Service By Mail
  22. Document filed Comment Points and Authorities in Opposition of Determining Petitioner as Presumed Parent
  23. Proof of Service Comment Proof of Service
  24. Initial OSC/Motion Original Type Initial OSC/Motion Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Hearing Time 1:30 PM Result Continued Court's Motion
  25. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed Comment Attorney Rusca
  26. Appeared in Person Comment Attorney R. E. Rusca
  27. Interpreter appearing with Petitioner
  28. Court orders Comment The Court finds it is in the best interest to issue visitation orders. The Court makes the following orders. The Court orders the petitioner's contact with the minor child shall be limited to participation in agency supervised visitation at Child Supportive Services. Supervised visitation shall occur once per week, on Saturday or Sunday, and for no more than four hours per visit. The parties shall register with Child Supportive Services within 24 hours of today's date and provide availability. Each party shall pay his/her own registration fee. The cost of supervised visitation shall be paid by the petitioner.
  29. Court orders Comment Attorney Rusca shall prepare order after hearing and provide it to opposing counsel for signature prior to submission to the Court.
  30. Court orders Comment The Court declines to make custody orders.
  31. Court orders Comment The matter is set for a contested hearing on November 12, 2025 at 1:30 p.m., November 13, 2025 at 1:30 p.m., November 18, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. and November 19, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 203. The parties are ordered to comply with Local Rule 5.8.
  32. Court orders Comment The matter is set for trial confirmation and status on August 25, 2025 at 9:30 a.m. in Department 203 to confirm registration is complete. Attorney Nilan and the petitioner are authorized to appear via Zoom at the next hearing.
  33. Court orders Comment The parties are ordered to meet and confer prior to the next hearing.
  34. Proposed Documents Comment OAH D203
  35. Order after Hearing Comment
  36. Status Review Original Type Status Review Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Hearing Time 9:30 AM Result Continued Party's Motion Comment trial confirmation
  37. Appeared in Person
  38. Remote Appearance Via Zoom
  39. Court orders Comment The matter is set for further trial confirmation on October 14, 2025 at 9:30 a.m. in Department 203.
  40. Court orders Comment The parties shall meet and confer prior to the next hearing.
  41. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed
  42. Declaration Filed Comment Petitioner's Filing of Supervised Visitation Reports and Photos
  43. Proof of Service Comment Electronic
  44. Trial Confirmation Original Type Trial Confirmation Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Hearing Time 9:30 AM Result Continued Party's Motion
  45. Appeared in Person
  46. Court orders Comment The contested hearing is vacated.
  47. Court orders Comment The matter is set for trial setting on November 12, 2025 at 1:30 p.m. in Department 203.
  48. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed
  49. Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance Original Type Chambers Work - Notice of Remote Appearance Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Hearing Time 4:00 PM Result Heard
  50. Notice of Remote Appearance. Comment Party: Petitioner; Attorney for Petitioner Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  51. Order Regarding Remote Appearance Granted Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Comment Party: Carmona, Ignacio; Nilan, Timothy E Type of Appearance Requested: Zoom
  52. Notice of Order on Remote Appearance Comment Emailed to: Attorney for Petitioner; Zoom Link Included
  53. Trial Setting Original Type Trial Setting Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Hearing Time 1:30 PM Result Heard
  54. Appeared in Person
  55. Petitioner not present in court
  56. Respondent not present in court
  57. Court orders Comment On agreement by counsel, the matter is ordered off calendar.
  58. Contested Hearing Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Hearing Time 1:30 PM Cancel Reason Court Order
  59. Contested Hearing Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Hearing Time 1:30 PM Cancel Reason Court Order
  60. Contested Hearing Judicial Officer Vasquez, Mary Hearing Time 1:30 PM Cancel Reason Court Order
  61. Proposed Documents Comment NEJ
  62. Proposed Documents Comment FL-240
  63. Appearance Stipulation and Waiver
  64. Proposed Documents Comment FL230
  65. Proposed Documents Comment Jgmt
  66. Minute Order-Orders electronically mailed
  67. Declaration for Default filed Comment UPA
  68. Stipulation Filed
  69. Notice of Entry of Judgment Comment Copies of NEJ sent to parties in SASE provided.
  70. Withdraw of Attorney Comment Attorney Withdrawing:

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more