Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-12-30
Status Open
Type Dispute Concerning Title
Docket 14 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Sarah Stanley, Individually And As Special Personal Representative Of The Estate Of Ryan J. Paddy
Defendant Sherman, Jessica

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Endorsement on Motion to Appoint Special Process Server (#3.0): ALLOWED Motion ALLOWED. Attest: Tracy Gerry, Operations Supervisor. Judge: Bloomer, Hon. William F
  2. Case assigned to: DCM Track F - Fast Track was added on 12/30/2025
  3. Verified Complaint and Jury Demand
  4. Civil action cover sheet filed.
  5. Demand for jury trial entered.
  6. Plaintiff Sarah Stanley, Individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan J. Paddy's Motion to Appoint Special Process Server
  7. Plaintiff Sarah Stanley, Individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan J. Paddy's EX PARTE Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
  8. Plaintiff Sarah Stanley, Individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan J. Paddy's Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Ex-Parte Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order
  9. Plaintiff Sarah Stanley, Individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan J. Paddy's EX PARTE Motion for Endorsement of Lis Pendens
  10. Plaintiff Sarah Stanley, Individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan J. Paddy's Motion for Preliminary Injunction
  11. Plaintiff Sarah Stanley, Individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan J. Paddy's Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction
  12. Endorsement on Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (#4.0): DENIED After review, DENIED. Short Order of Notice of hearing on Paper No. 6 to issue.
  13. Endorsement on Motion for a Memorandum of Lis Pendens (#5.0): DENIED without prejudice because the Plaintiff has failed to show entitlement to ex parte relief, see Ferguson v. Maxim, 96 Mass. App. Ct. 385, 388 n.10 (2019); GL c. 184 * 15(b), and the plaintiff's verification of the complaint fails to comply with said 15(b). DeCroteau v. DeCroteau, 90 Mass. App. Ct. 903, 906 (2016).
  14. Summons and order of notice issued on a Motion for a Preliminary Injunction , returnable on 01/08/2026 02:00 PM Hearing on Preliminary Injunction. Applies To: Sarah Stanley, Individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan J. Paddy (Plaintiff); Sherman, Jessica (Defendant); Moynihan, Esq., James Michael (Attorney) on behalf of Sarah Stanley, Individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan J. Paddy (Plaintiff); Sambataro, Esq., Christopher M (Attorney) on behalf of Sarah Stanley, Individually and as Special Personal Representative of the Estate of Ryan J. Paddy (Plaintiff)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more