Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oklahoma unified county

Court

Oklahoma unified county

Oklahoma

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-18
Type Damages $10,001 Or More
Docket 76 entries
Disposition without prejudice
Photo of Hon. Smith Bret

Judge

Hon. Smith Bret

Muskogee County (OK)

Oklahoma

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. FILE & ENTER PETITION
  2. LAW LIBRARY
  3. DISPUTE MEDIATION
  4. OKLAHOMA COURT INFORMATION SYSTEM FEE - EFFECTIVE 07/01/04
  5. LENGTHY TRIAL FUND
  6. OK COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
  7. 10% OF CASA TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  8. OK COUNCIL ON JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS REVOLVING FUND
  9. 10% OF COJC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  10. STATE JUDICIAL REV. FUND INTERPRETER & TRANSLATOR SERVICES
  11. COURTHOUSE SECURITY FEE
  12. 10% OF CHSC TO COURT CLERK REVOLVING FUND
  13. 15% TO DISTRICT COURT REVOLVING FUND
  14. COURT CLERK PRESERVATION FUND
  15. SUMMONS ISSUED SHERIFF OUT OF COUNTY TO DEF: ARIOLDIS DIAZ FERRER
  16. SERVICE FEE FOR SUMMONS TO SHERIFF
  17. AJE: COST DUE TO CARD ALLOCATION FEE
  18. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  19. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  20. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  21. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  22. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  23. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  24. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  25. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  26. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  27. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  28. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  29. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  30. AJE: MONIES DUE THE FOLLOWING AGENCY(IES) REDUCED
  31. ADJUST FOR CREDIT CARD
  32. SHERIFF'S SUMMONS RETURN
  33. ANSWER TO THE PETITION FOR DAMAGES
  34. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE
  35. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE
  36. ORDER FOR HEARING
  37. DEFENDANT'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR DAMAGES
  38. DEFENDANT'S REDSPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE
  39. REQUEST FOR COURT INTERPRETER
  40. PLAINTIFF'S CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST AMENDED ANSWER AND DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE
  41. ORDER FOR COURTROOM INTERPRETER
  42. MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
  43. MOTION TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT'S PRESENCE AT ALL HEARINGS AND TRIAL
  44. SCHEDULING ORDER
  45. FILING NOTICE AND PROPOSED SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE (EXHIBIT A)
  46. CM: PL/ PRO SE- PRESENT; DEF/PRO SE-PRESENT; CT REPORTER-A SHERRICK; CT INTERPRETER- MARITZA MARTINEZ- VIA TEAMS FOR THE DEF. MS. MARTINEZ WAS SWORN IN AS THE INTERPRETER FOR THE DEF. SCHEDULED ORDER ENTERED. -BS
  47. AMENDED MOTION TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT'S PRESENCE AT ALL SUBSTANTIVE HEARINGS AND TRIAL
  48. AMENDED MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE
  49. AMENDED FILING NOTICE AND PROPOSED SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE (EXHIBIT A)
  50. DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFF'S CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE AND MOTION IN LIMINE
  51. PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE REGARDING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN LIMINE
  52. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  53. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  54. PLAINTIFF'S PRELIMINARY WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  55. DEFENDANT'S COMBINED RESP0ONSE AND OBJECTION TO (1) PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT'S PRESENCE AT ALL SUBSTANTIVE HEARINGS AND TRIAL; (2) PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE; AND (3) PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED FILING NOTICE AND PROPOSED SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE (EXHIBIT A)
  56. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE AND OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND TO REQUIRE DEFENDANT'S PRESENCE AT ALL HEARINGS AND TRIAL
  57. MOTION TO SEAL SENSITIVE AND CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS
  58. MOTION TO COMPEL RULING ON FULLY BRIEFED MOTIONS
  59. NOTICE OF FILING PROPOSED ORDERS
  60. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  61. PLAINTIFF'S URGENT NOTICE OF IMMINENT RISK OF SPOLIATION AND REQUEST FOR IMMEDIATE, EX PARTE RULING ON THREE IMPERATIVE PROPOSED ORDERS
  62. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE OF CERTAIN MOTIONS AND RELATED FILINGWS
  63. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF CORRECTION OF CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  64. DEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S "PRELIMINARY WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST"
  65. DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION AND MOTION FOR PRODUCTIVE ORDER
  66. EXTEMELY REINFORCED MOTION IN LIMINE BY DEFENDANT TO EXCLUDE ALL UNAUTHENTICIATED EVIDENCE, CHARACTER EVIDENCE, NON-OFFICAL IMMIGRATION DOCUMENTS, HOSTILE PUBLICATIONS, AND UNILATERAL DIGITAL MATERIAL, WITH FORMAL REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS FOR PROCEDURAL ABUSE AND CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF DUE PROCESS
  67. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF PRO SE APPEARANCE
  68. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  69. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  70. PLAINTIFF'S FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  71. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL
  72. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY CERTIFIED MAIL
  73. PLAINTIFF'S COMBINED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE, MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER, OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S PRELIMINARY WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST, AND MOTION TO ACCEPT LATE FILING
  74. PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S INTIMELY FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST AND COMBINED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  75. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND AND SUPPLEMENT FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST
  76. DEFENDANT'S FINAL WITNESS AND EXHIBIT LIST

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more