Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Polk County

Court

Polk County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-08-29
Type Negmt Negligence Mass Tort
Docket 76 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Kurowski Bonnie 3033 Santa Maria Ave Clermont Fl 34715
Defendant Polk County Sheriff Office 1891 Jim Keene Rd Winter Haven Fl 33880
Photo of Hon. Michael McDaniel

Judge

Hon. Michael McDaniel

Polk County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. MOTION TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE
  2. EMERGENCY MOTION TO COMPEL CLERK TO DOCKET AND PROCESS ALL FILINGS
  3. COVER LETTER FROM PRO-SE PLAINTIFF
  4. NOTICE OF FILING - COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, INJUNCTIVE, AND MONETARY RELIEF - PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
  5. FOR SUMMARY DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND EMERGENCY RULING
  6. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, INJUNCTIVE, AND MONETARY RELIEF; JURY DEMAND
  7. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN (EXPIDITED WITH AUTOMATICE RULINGS)
  8. LETTER FROM CLERK FILING FEE DUE
  9. JUDGE'S RESPONSE, DENIED
  10. APPLICATION FOR INDIGENT STATUS (DO NO USE)
  11. ORDER ESTABLISHING CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN - STREAMLINED
  12. APPLICATION
  13. APPLICATION FOR INDIGENT STATUS (DO NO USE)
  14. CLERK'S DETERMINATION OF INDIGENT STATUS APPROVED
  15. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- POLK COUNTY SHERIFF GRADY JUDD
  16. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY DETERMINATION THAT IMMUNITY DEFENSES DO NOT APPLY
  17. PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF SURVIVAL OF COMPLAINT
  18. PLAINTIFF'S PRE-DISCOVERY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AGAINST DEFENDANT HANLON
  19. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE REQUESTING CLERK TO TRANSMIT SUMMONS FOR SERVICE
  20. CLERK'S DETERMINATION OF INDIGENT STATUS (APPLICATION ONLY)
  21. LETTER
  22. LETTER
  23. LETTER
  24. APPLICATION FOR INDIGENT STATUS (DO NO USE)
  25. LETTER FROM DEPUTY CLERK RE:INDIGENCY
  26. CLERK'S DETERMINATION OF INDIGENT STATUS (APPLICATION ONLY)
  27. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- CATHY CRIBBS
  28. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK- SHAWN CRIBBS
  29. LETTER FROM CLERK
  30. COURT PROCESS COVERSHEET
  31. LETTER FROM CLERK
  32. RETURN OF SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED - POLK COUNTY SHERIFF GRADY JUDD BY SERVING JASON REUTER
  33. RETURN OF SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED - CATHY CRIBBS
  34. MOTION TO DISMISS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITIE STATEMENT
  35. MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE - DEFENDANT CATHY FULTZ
  36. Calendar entry added for: 03/20/2026 03:00 PM
  37. Reason: MOTION TO DISMISS
  38. EMERGENCY MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DETERMINATION OF LEGAL ELEMENTS OF CYBERSTALKING CHARGE AND
  39. IMMEDIATE RELIEF FROM ONGOING HARM
  40. NOTICE OF HEARING
  41. AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING
  42. AMENDED VERIFIED CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 AND 1985 FOR DECLARATORY / INJUNCTIVE
  43. AND MONETARY RELIEF AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  44. PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENED COMPLAINT
  45. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
  46. JUDGE'S RESPONSE - DENIED
  47. UNIVERSAL NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS/FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS PROTECTIONS, AND INTERNATIONALIST
  48. JOURNALIST IMMUNITY; OBJECTIONS TO RETALIATORY ALLIGATIONS AND VEXATIOUS LITIGANT DESIGNATION;
  49. DEMAND FOR JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY AND PROTECTION FROM THIRD-PARTY INTERFERENCE
  50. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE RULING ON PENDING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
  51. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND PENDING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND
  52. OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION FOR CLERK'S DEFAULT
  53. SERVICE OF PROCESS UNSERVED - SHAWN CRIBBS
  54. Calendar entry added for: 02/09/2026 10:30 AM
  55. Reason: OTSC
  56. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT AND FOR ENTRY OF CLERK'S DEFAULT
  57. LETTER FROM PLAINTIFF
  58. NOTICE OF FILING AMENDED COMPLAINT
  59. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE
  60. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS VARIOUS MOTIONS
  61. ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF BONNIE KUROWSKIS INDIGENCY STATUS SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED
  62. PURSUANT TO FLA STAT SEC 57 082(7)(A)(2025)
  63. ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF BONNIE KUROWSKI SHOULD NOT BE DECLARED A VEXATIOUS
  64. LITIGANT PURSUANT TO FLA STAT SEC 68 093(2025)
  65. RENEWED MOTION FOR DEFAULT
  66. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF BONNIE KUROWSKI'S INDIGENCY
  67. STATUS SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED PURSUANT TO FLA. STAT. SEC. 57.082(7)(A) (2025)
  68. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER TO APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY PLAINTIFF, BONNIE KUROWSKI SHOULD
  69. NOT BE DECLARED A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT PURSUANT TO FLA. STAT. SEC. 68.093 (2025)
  70. DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DEEM PLAINTIFF A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
  71. EXHIBIT A- V
  72. MOTION FOR DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT, MOTION TO STRIKE ALL POST-DEFAULT FILINGS AND TO LIMIT
  73. PROCEEDINGS TO THIS CASE ONLY
  74. APPENDIX A / PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' ALLEGATIONS
  75. REQUEST TO DOCKET MOTION FOR DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT MOTION TO STRIKE ALL POST DEFAULT FILINGS AND TO
  76. LIMIT PROCEEDINGS TO THIS CASE ONLY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more