Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Oakland Co

Court

Oakland Co

Michigan

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-09-10
Type Cb
Docket 30 entries

Parties

Plaintiff None|Marx Layne & Co
Defendant Snyder Christine
Photo of Hon. MICHAEL WARREN

Judge

Hon. MICHAEL WARREN

Oakland County (MI)

Michigan

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. PROPOSED ORDER FILED
  2. DATE SET FOR TRIAL ON 11232026 08 30 AM Y 02
  3. PROCEEDING TO BE HELD IN-PERSON
  4. SCHEDULING ORDER FILED
  5. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  6. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FILED
  7. ANSWER FILED TO CTR CLM/AFFIRM DEF/PLF
  8. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  9. DATE SET FOR E SCHED C ON 11142025 08 30 AM Y
  10. PROCEEDING TO BE HELD REMOTELY BY ZOOM
  11. ORDER FILED AMD/NTC/TO APPEAR/CASE MGMT CONF
  12. OPINION FILED /ORD DENY PLF MTN FOR PRELIM INJUNCTION
  13. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  14. BRIEF FILED IN RES TO PLF MTN PRELIM INJ/DFT
  15. APPEARANCE FILED /NTC/DFT
  16. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  17. MIFILE PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  18. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED /AFM/CNTRCLM/SNYDER
  19. AFFIDAVIT/PROOF OF SERVICE FILED
  20. NOTICE OF HEARING FILED
  21. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 10222025 JUDGE 02
  22. P/S ON SUMMONS FILED 09/18/25
  23. P/S ON SUMMONS FILED 09/17/25
  24. MOTION PRAECIPE FILED FOR 10082025 JUDGE 02
  25. ORDER FILED DENY EXPARTE RELIEF
  26. MOTION FILED PRELIM INJ/BRF/PLF
  27. NOTICE OF HEARING FILED
  28. COMPLAINT FILED /NTC BUS CT
  29. SUMMONS ISSUED
  30. MOTION FILED XPARTE FOR PRELIM INJUNC/BRF/PLF

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more