Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Dallas County Civil

Court

Dallas County Civil

Texas

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-16
Status CLOSED
Type Other (civil)
Docket 23 entries
Disposition without prejudice

Parties

Plaintiff Gordon, Stacey
Defendant Greenfield, Adam S|Joseph Farzam Law Firm, A Professional Corporation
Photo of Hon. Taylor, Nicole

Judge

Hon. Taylor, Nicole

Dallas County (TX)

Texas

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. 07/21/2026 JURY TRIAL View Document 2 CCL#5 JURY TRIAL LETTER View Document 2 CCL#5 JURY TRIAL LETTER View Document 2 CCL#5 JURY TRIAL LETTER Judicial Officer TAYLOR, NICOLE Hearing Time 9:30 AM Cancel Reason BY COURT ADMINISTRATOR
  2. 01/16/2025 ORIGINAL PETITION View Document CORRESPONDENCE View Document PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND JURY DEMAND Comment PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION AND JURY DEMAND
  3. 01/21/2025 ISSUE CITATION View Document CITATION 2012 Comment ESERVE ENVELOPE 96503508
  4. 01/22/2025 JURY DEMAND
  5. 01/22/2025 CITATION (SERVICE) Served 01/29/2025 Anticipated Server ATTORNEY Anticipated Method Actual Server PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER Returned 02/03/2025
  6. 01/22/2025 CITATION (SERVICE) Served 01/29/2025 Anticipated Server ATTORNEY Anticipated Method Actual Server PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER Returned 02/03/2025
  7. 02/03/2025 RETURN OF SERVICE View Document RETURN OF SERVICE Comment ADAM GREENFIELD
  8. 02/24/2025 ORIGINAL ANSWER - GENERAL DENIAL View Document DEFENDANT S ORIGINAL ANSWER
  9. 03/06/2025 AMENDED PETITION View Document REQUEST FOR CITATION View Document PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED ORIGINAL PETITION Comment FIRST AMENDED
  10. 03/12/2025 ISSUE CITATION View Document ISSUE CITATION Comment E-SERVE ENV# 98564182
  11. 03/17/2025 CITATION (SERVICE) Served 05/01/2025 Anticipated Server ATTORNEY Anticipated Method Actual Server PRIVATE PROCESS SERVER Returned 05/09/2025
  12. 04/21/2025 DISMISSAL HEARING View Document 1 CCL#5 Y LETTER View Document 1 CCL#5 Y LETTER View Document 1 CCL#5 Y LETTER Judicial Officer TAYLOR, NICOLE Hearing Time 9:30 AM Cancel Reason BY COURT ADMINISTRATOR
  13. 05/09/2025 RETURN OF SERVICE View Document RETURN OF SERVICE Comment JOSEPH FARZAM LAW FIRM
  14. 05/22/2025 PROPOSED ORDER View Document PROPOSED ORDER Comment PROPOSED AGREED SCHEDULING ORDER
  15. 05/26/2025 DISMISSAL HEARING View Document CCL#5 ASO REQUEST Judicial Officer TAYLOR, NICOLE Hearing Time 9:30 AM Cancel Reason BY COURT ADMINISTRATOR Comment IF ASO IS NOT REC'D
  16. 05/27/2025 ORDER - SCHEDULING View Document ORDER - SCHEDULING Comment AGREED
  17. 06/13/2025 MOTION - DEFAULT JUDGMENT View Document PROPOSED ORDER FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT View Document PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Comment PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT JOSEPH FARZAM LAW FIRM
  18. 06/20/2025 RETURNED MAIL View Document RETURNED MAIL Comment ADAM S. GREENFIELD
  19. 06/24/2025 ORIGINAL ANSWER - GENERAL DENIAL View Document DEFENDANT JOSEPH FARZAM LAW FIRM'S ORIGINAL ANSWER Comment DEFENDANT JOSEPH FARZAM LAW FIRM'S ORIGINAL ANSWER
  20. 10/23/2025 NOTICE - NONSUIT View Document PROPOSED ORDER OF NON-SUIT View Document NOTICE OF NON-SUIT Comment NOTICE OF NON-SUIT
  21. 10/28/2025 ORDER - NONSUIT DISMISSAL W/OUT PREJUDICE View Document ORDER - NONSUIT DISMISSAL W/OUT PREJUDICE
  22. 10/29/2025 NOTICE OF NONSUIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE View Document NOTICE OF NONSUIT WITHOUT PREJUDICE
  23. 07/13/2026 PRE-TRIAL HEARING View Document PRE-TRIAL HEARING NOTICE View Document PRE-TRIAL HEARING NOTICE View Document PRE-TRIAL HEARING NOTICE Judicial Officer TAYLOR, NICOLE Hearing Time 1:30 PM Cancel Reason BY COURT ADMINISTRATOR

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more