Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Knox Co

Court

Knox Co

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-29
Status CASE REOPENED (RO)
Type Dissolution With Children
Docket 41 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Reed, Hunter|Evans, Marcus
Photo of Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Judge

Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Knox County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. ETURN RECEIPT FILED WITH DATE SIGNED HUNTER REED (11/25)
  2. ETITION W/SEPARATION AGREEMENT Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1); EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  3. ARENTING PLAN Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1); EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  4. ARENTING PROCEEDING AFFIDAVIT Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1)
  5. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED-HEALTH INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1)
  6. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- AFFIDAVIT OF PROPERTY AND DEBT Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1)
  7. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- AFFIDAVIT OF BASIC INFORMATION, INCOME AND EXPENSES Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1)
  8. ARENTING PROCEEDING AFFIDAVIT Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  9. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED-HEALTH INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  10. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- AFFIDAVIT OF PROPERTY AND DEBT Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  11. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- AFFIDAVIT OF BASIC INFORMATION, INCOME AND EXPENSES Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  12. AIVER OF VALUATION OF ASSETS Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1); EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  13. AIVER OF MAGISTRATE'S DECISION AND 14 DAY APPEAL Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1); EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  14. AIVER OF 30 DAY FILING PERIOD FOR THE SHARED PARENTING PLAN Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1); EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  15. MENDED PARENTING PLAN Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1); EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  16. OLLOWING WAS SCHEDULED: Judge: PLUMLY, NATASHA A Event: DISSOLUTION HEARING Date: 09/30/2025 Time: 01:00 PM
  17. EARING ASSIGNMENT / CASE SCHEDULE
  18. MENDMENT TO SEPARATION AGREEMENT Applies To: REED, HUNTER (PETITIONER 1); EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  19. ERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER'S FEES
  20. ISSOLUTION GRANTED SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND AMENDMENT TO SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND AMENDED SHARED PARENTING PLAN APPROVED. COPIES SENT VIA ATTORNEY BOX OR REGULAR MAIL.
  21. OTICE OF JOURNAL ENTRY FILING TO ATTYS. IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 58(B), IT IS VERIFIED THAT COPIES HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE PARTIES AND/OR THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIVIL RULE 5(B) ON THIS DAY.
  22. OPIES SENT TO MICHAEL D MILLER AND/OR CSS VIA E-MAIL OR BOX
  23. OPIES SENT BY REGULAR MAIL OR VIA ATTORNEY BOX IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B) HUNTER REED MARCUS EVANS
  24. INAL RECORD PAGES FEE
  25. ASE FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY
  26. TEMIZED BILL SENT TO: REED, HUNTER was sent bill for $207.75 printed on 10/06/2025
  27. TEMIZED BILL SENT TO: EVANS, MARCUS was sent bill for $207.75 printed on 10/06/2025
  28. OST DECREE FILING FEE
  29. OTION FOR CHANGE OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES (CUSTODY) Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  30. ARENTING PROCEEDING AFFIDAVIT Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  31. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED-HEALTH INSURANCE AFFIDAVIT Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  32. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- AFFIDAVIT OF BASIC INFORMATION, INCOME AND EXPENSES Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  33. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED- FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE/FEE-WAIVER AFFIDAVIT Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  34. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT COURT ORDER (DENIED) - APPLICANT IS NOT AN INDIGENT LITIGANT AND DENIES A WAIVER OF THE PREPAYMENT OF COSTS OR FEES IN THIS MATTER
  35. ONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT FILED - APPLICANT IS DENIED WAIVER OF PREPAYMENT COSTS
  36. OTICE W/ INSTRUCTIONS (C/CT) - NOW COMES KNOX COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES (CSS) AND NOTIFIES THE COURT AND THE PARTIES THAT CSS RECENTLY RECEIVED AN AMENDED PARENTING PLAN FILE STAMPED AUGUST 6, 2025. THE AMENDED PARENTING PLAN CONTAINS AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PER PAGE 6, OF AUGUST 2025. WHEN AN ENTRY ESTABLISHING A SUPPORT ORDER DOES NOT CONTAIN AN EXACT EFFECTIVE DATE, CSS DEFAULTS TO THE DATE THE DOCUMENT WAS FILED. IN THIS CASE, THE AMENDED PARENTING PLAN WAS FILED AUGUST 6, 2025. THEREFORE, SUBJECT TO OTHER COURT ORDER, CSS WILL UTILIZE AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF AUGUST 6, 2025.
  37. RDINARY MAIL ISSUED WITH CERTIFICATE OF MAILING FILED HUNTER REED MARCUS EVANS
  38. OPIES SENT TO MICHAEL D MILLER AND/OR CSS VIA E-MAIL OR BOX
  39. ITAL STATISTICS TO STATE
  40. NSTRUCTIONS OR PRAECIPE FILED Applies To: EVANS, MARCUS (PETITIONER 2)
  41. ERTIFIED MAIL ISSUED TO HUNTER REED (9414 7266 9904 2248 6428 01)

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more