Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-11-03
Type Ap Writ Of Mandamus
Docket 24 entries
Disposition disposed

Parties

Plaintiff Unsicker, Thomas F|Freed, Alan Edward|Bender Ley, Amy Elise
Defendant Warner, Natalie Paula|Gilmer, Joan M.

Docket Entries

  1. iling Fee Paid
  2. lerk Remark Copy of Court Order issued November 19, 2025, emailed to the Honorable Natalie Warner
  3. ourt Order Issued Relator has filed a Motion for Reconsideration of Relator's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus. Being duly advised in the premises, the Court hereby orders Relator's Motion for Reconsideration of Relator's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to be STRICKEN under Rule 84.24(l).
  4. otice Notice of Filing in Underlying Case; Exhibits; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER, SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  5. otion to Reconsider Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER, SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  6. lerk Remark Copy of Writ Order dated November 17, 2025, emailed to the Honorable Natalie Warner
  7. isposed- Pet for Writ Denied Relator has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus along with Suggestions in Support and Exhibits. Relator also filed a Notice of Motion for Default Order and Judgment in the underlying case. Respondent has filed a Response to Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Relator has filed a Motion to Strike Respondent's Response to Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus. Respondent has filed a Response to the Motion to Strike. Being duly advised in the premises, the Court hereby DENIES Relator's Motion to Strike Respondent's Response to Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The Court also DENIES Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
  8. iling Response to Motion to Strike; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ALAN EDWARD FREED On Behalf Of: THOMAS F UNSICKER
  9. otion to Strike Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER, SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  10. uggestions in Opposition Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: ALAN EDWARD FREED On Behalf Of: THOMAS F UNSICKER
  11. iling Notice of Service; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER, SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  12. otice Notice of Motion in Underlying Case; Motion for Interlocutory Default in Underlying Case; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service. Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER, SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  13. lerk Remark Copy of Court Order issued November 5, 2025, emailed to the Honorable Natalie Warner.
  14. ourt Order Issued Relator has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus along with Suggestions in Support and Exhibits. Respondent is directed to file Suggestions in Opposition to the Petition for Writ of Mandamus on or before THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 2025.
  15. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  16. iling Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  17. edacted Info Flng Sheet Filed Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  18. edacted Info Flng Sheet Filed Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  19. xhibits Filed Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  20. uggestions in Support Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  21. rit Filed in MO Ct of Appeals Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER
  22. rit Summary Filed Filed By: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER On Behalf Of: SARAH LOUISE UNSICKER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.