Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-12-01
Status Open
Type Ota Other
Docket 18 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Nelson, Bradley R.
Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.a.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Plaintiff's Status Report Re: Violation of the Bankruptcy Stay and Unlawful Foreclose Action; Void Sale pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362(a), filed.
  2. Case assigned to the Average Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
  3. Land Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 465831 Date: 12/01/2025
  4. Land Court surcharge Receipt: 465831 Date: 12/01/2025
  5. Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  6. Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, filed.
  7. Memorandum of Law in Support of Emergency Temporary Restraining Order, filed.
  8. Affidavit of Bradley Nelson, filed.
  9. PROPOSED Plaintiff's Injunctive Relief and Temporary Restraining Order, filed.
  10. Certificate of Service, filed.
  11. Scheduled Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Temporary Restraining Order Date: 12/01/2025 Time: 03:30 PM
  12. Event Resulted: Temporary Restraining Order scheduled on: 12/01/2025 03:30 PM Has been: Held in person Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding December 1, 2025. Hearing on Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order held in-person at the Land Court. Plaintiff, Bradley R. Nelson appeared Pro Se. Plaintiff's Oral Motion for Short Order of Notice ALLOWED by the court. Summons to issue on a Preliminary Injunction Hearing to be held on Wednesday, December 3, 2025, at 9:00 AM, to be held in-person at the Land Court. The Plaintiff is to obtain the sealed summons for said hearing from the Land Court Recorder's Office. Plaintiff is to serve the summons, complaint, and all papers upon the defendants so the papers are received by them no later than December 2, 2025 by close of business if the hearing is to go forward on December 3, 2025 as scheduled. Service may be effectuated by any licensed constable. (Smith, J.).
  13. Summons and Hearing Notice issued on Application for Preliminary Injunction. Judge: Smith, Hon. Kevin T. Event: Hearing on Preliminary Injunction Date: 12/03/2025 Time: 09:00 AM To be held: in-person at the courthouse
  14. Notice of Docket Entry: Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Bradley R. Nelson [email protected] Sent On: 12/01/2025 16:12:24 (Sent via email on 12/01/2025 to Bradley R. Nelson)
  15. Appearance of Sean Robert Higgins, Esq. for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed
  16. Defendant's Opposition to Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, filed. (Courtesy copy received).
  17. Event Resulted: Hearing on Preliminary Injunction scheduled on: 12/03/2025 09:00 AM Has been: Held in person Hon. Kevin T. Smith, Presiding December 3, 2025. Emergency Motion Hearing held live at the Land Court. The Plaintiff, Bradley Nelson, did not appear. Attorneys Sean Higgins and Keith McCarthy appeared on behalf of the Defendant, Wells Fargo. Mr. Nelson has filed suit against the Defendant, Wells Fargo, in which he alleges that it does not have the legal authority to conduct the mortgage foreclosure sale scheduled for today at 10:00 AM. The property in question is 65 Lovers Lane in Groton. Before the court is the Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order to stop the scheduled foreclosure sale and the Defendant's Opposition. Notwithstanding the failure of Mr. Nelson to appear for the hearing that he requested, the court allowed counsel for Wells Fargo the opportunity to argue in opposition to Mr. Nelson's motion for the TRO. Counsel indicated that there are procedural failures in Mr. Nelson's attempt to stop the foreclosure including a failure of service on the Defendant. Counsel became aware of Mr. Nelson's complaint and this hearing through a litigation monitoring service to which his law firm subscribes. On the merits, counsel argued that there is no factual or legal basis for the court to grant the relief requested by Mr. Nelson. He recounted a history of litigation in multiple courts beginning in 2012, through which Mr. Nelson sought to stop or frustrate the Defendant's efforts to complete the mortgage foreclosure. The exhibits attached to the Defendant's Opposition reflect the docket sheets and other germane court rulings from these several actions. Following argument, the court DENIED the Plaintiff's Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order for the reasons set forth in the Defendant's Opposition and as put forth on the record in open court. (Smith, J.).
  18. Defendant's Status Report Re: Foreclosure Auction, filed.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.