Which Lawyers Win Before Your Judge?

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know Your Judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know The Lawyers

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know Your Court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Middlesex County

Court

Middlesex County

Connecticut

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-06-20
Type V 04 Vehicular Motor Vehicles Pedestrian Vs. Driver
Docket 58 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Chase A White|Morgan White|Manafort Brothers Inc.
Defendant Yarkpazuo Kalapele Morris|Joe E. Jones|Jo Ryu Security/body Guard Services, Llc|Newfield Construction Group Llc, D/b/a Newfield Construction|Newfield Construction Inc.

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. MOTION FOR ORDER Renewed Motion for Order of Compliance
  2. APPEARANCE
  3. APPEARANCE Appearance
  4. APPEARANCE Appearance
  5. APPEARANCE Appearance
  6. APPEARANCE Appearance
  7. NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY / HEARING (JDCV53)
  8. APPLICATION FOR PREJUDGMENT REMEDY
  9. PROPOSED WRIT SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT
  10. PRE-SERVICE ORDER FOR HEARING AND NOTICE
  11. SUMMONS FOR HEARING
  12. MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF ASSETS
  13. AFFIDAVIT
  14. CONTINUATION OF PARTIES
  15. ORDER PJR order RESULT: Order 10/2/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  16. ORDER Order for Hearing RESULT: Order 6/20/2025 BY THE CLERK Last Updated: Additional Description - 06/20/2025
  17. NOTICE Notie re: Status and PJR Hearing Last Updated: Additional Description - 06/20/2025
  18. PROPOSED ORDER
  19. RETURN OF PREJUDGMENT REMEDY AS SERVED
  20. MOTION TO INTERVENE RESULT: Granted 8/4/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  21. ORDER RESULT: Granted 8/4/2025 HON EDWARD DOMNARSKI
  22. MOTION FOR DEFAULT -FAILURE TO APPEAR PB 17-20 RESULT: Denied 8/26/2025 BY THE CLERK
  23. ORDER RESULT: Denied 8/26/2025 BY THE CLERK
  24. NOTICE Notice of Service I&P - All Defendants
  25. LIST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a) PJR Exhibits
  26. ANSWER AND SPECIAL DEFENSE
  27. CLAIM FOR JURY OF 6
  28. NOTICE Def Yarkpazuo Kalapele Morris' Notice of Filing Ints and RPD to Plfs
  29. ANSWER by Joe E. Jones
  30. OBJECTION to PJR by Joe E. Jones
  31. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO PLEAD
  32. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE PJR Hearing RESULT: Order 9/18/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  33. ORDER RESULT: Order 9/18/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  34. REPLY Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendant's Objection to PJR
  35. REQUEST TO REVISE Defendant Morris' Answer and Special Defense #109.00
  36. OBJECTION to Plfs' Application for Prejudgment Remedy
  37. MEMORANDUM of Law ISO Objection to Plfs' Application for Prejudgment Remedy
  38. REPLY PLAINTIFFS? REPLY & MEMORANDUM OF LAW - DEFENDANT?S OBJECTION TO PJR (NO. 118.00)
  39. MEMORANDUM Pretrial Memo Listing Economic Damages
  40. LIST OF EXHIBITS (JD-CL-28/JD-CL-28a)
  41. NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE of Newfield Construction Group, LLC d/b/a Newfield Construction and Newfield Construction, Inc.
  42. SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT As Served Pursuant to CGS 52-278d
  43. RETURN OF SERVICE Return of Service of Writ, Summons, and Complaint Pursuant to CGS 52-278d
  44. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to Comply with Court Order RESULT: Order 11/17/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  45. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/17/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  46. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to Comply with Court Order No. 100.50 RESULT: Order 11/17/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  47. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/17/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  48. RETURN OF SERVICE Return of Service of Amended Writ, Summons, and Complaint Pursuant to CGS 52-72
  49. AMENDED COMPLAINT AS SERVED Amended Writ, Summons, and Complaint per CGS 52-72 as served
  50. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Objection to #127 and Motion to Compel Compliance with #100.50
  51. OBJECTION TO MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME Objection to #126 and Motion to Compel Compliance with #100.50
  52. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 for Yarkpazuo Morris to Respond to Plaintiffs' Discovery Requests RESULT: Order 11/17/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  53. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/17/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  54. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13 for Yarkpazuo Morris to Respond to Newfield Construction's Discovery RESULT: Order 11/17/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  55. ORDER RESULT: Order 11/17/2025 HON RUPAL SHAH
  56. MOTION FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE - PB SEC 13-14 (INTERR/PROD - 13-6/13-9) Def Yarkpazuo Morris' Motion for Order of Compliance to Pltfs C. White and M. White
  57. MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME RE DISCOVERY MOTION OR REQUEST PB CH13
  58. MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION-COURT ORDER by Defendant Jones re: Order #100.50

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more