Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-11-03
Status ACTIVE
Type Crim Appeal Circuit To District
Docket 15 entries
Disposition Judgment

Parties

Plaintiff Barnett, Michael William
Photo of Hon. Ward David Vincent

Judge

Hon. Ward David Vincent

Highlands County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: THE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FILED BY THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS GRANTED. WITHIN TWENTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER SHALL FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE THAT ADDRESSES WHETHER THIS APPEAL WAS FILED PREMATURELY (6D2025-2741)
  2. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE DOCUMENT FILED AS THE ORDER APPEALED IN THIS CASE, DOCKETED NOVEMEBER 4,2025, IT APPEARS THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDERFOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT WAS COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT IN LOWER TRIBUNAL. WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THE PUBLIC DEFENDER SHALL FILE A RESPONSETHAT ADDRESSES APPELLANT'S REPRESENTATION IN LOWER TRIBUANL ( 6D2025-2741 )
  3. DescriptionCompliance CRIM APPEAL REC DUE has been created with due date of 12/31/2025
  4. DescriptionRESPONSE TO 6DCA RE: ORDER FILED 11/04/2025 SEEKING REVIEW AND RESPONSE ON APPELLANT HAVING REPRESENTATION AT TIME OF SENTENCE
  5. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: WITHIN FORTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, APPELLANT SHALL EITHER PAY TO THE CLERK OF SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THE $300.00 FILING FEE REQUIRED BY SECTION 35.22, FL STATUTES, OR FILE IN THIS COURT A CERTIFIED COPY OF LOWER TRIBUNAL'S ORDER OF INSOLVENCY FOR APPELLATE PURPOSE AS DESCRIBED UNDER FL RILE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.430. TO OBTAIN AN ORDER OF INSOLVENCY, APPELLANT MUST FILE A MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY WITH THE CLERK OF LOWER TRIBUNAL ( 6D2025-2741 )
  6. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: APPELLANT HAS FILED A PRO SE NOTICE OF APPEAL SEEKING REVIEW OF CRIMINAL JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE. WITHIN TEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THE CLERK OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL SHALL FILE A RESPONSE THAT IDENTIFIES APPELLANT'S TRIAL COUNSEL OF RECORD AT THE TIME THE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCE WAS RENDERED, OR CERTIFIES THAT APPELLANT WAS UNREPRESENTED APPEARING PRO SE AT THE TIME THE JUDGEMENT AND SENTENCE WAS RENDERED ( 6D2025-2741 )
  7. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: THIS CASE, FILED PRO SE, APPEARS TO SEEK REVIEW OF AN ORDER ENTERED IN CRIMINAL CASE AND SHALL PROCEED UNDER FL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.140. WITHIN FIFTY DAYS FROM THE DATE THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS FILED IN THE LOWER TRIBUNAL, THE CLERK OF THE LOWER TRIBUNAL SHALL TRANSMIT THE RECORD ON APPEAL TO THIS COURT OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FILE A NOITCE OF INABILITY TO DO SO, SPECIFYING THE SEASON. APPELLANT MUST ENSURE THE TIMELY TRANSMISSION OF RECORD ( 6D2025-2741 )
  8. DescriptionACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM DISTRICT COURT ( 6D2025-2741 )
  9. DescriptionJudge: WARD , DAVID VINCENT Assigned
  10. Prosecutor: JAMES UTHMEIER Assigned
  11. NOTICE OF APPEAL TRANSMITTAL FORM
  12. DISPOSITION MEMORANDUM- FROM 10/14/2025
  13. MOTION FOR STAY
  14. NOTICE OF APPEAL
  15. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $100.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.