Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-10-30
Status ACTIVE
Type Civil Appl To Dca/supreme
Docket 21 entries
Disposition appeal is dismissed

Parties

Plaintiff Norris, Thelma C
Defendant Hl Compton Co A Florida Profit
Photo of Hon. Ritenour Anthony

Judge

Hon. Ritenour Anthony

Highlands County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: HAVING REVIEWED APPELLANT'S RESPONSE, AND IN CONSIDERATION THAT IT FAILS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED PERSUANT TO THIS COURT'S OCTOBER 30, 2025, OEDER, THIS APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS UNTIMELY.
  2. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: WITHIN TWENTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, APPELLANT SHALL FILE A RESPONSE IN THIS COURT THAT SHOWS CAUSE WHY THIS APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED BECAUSE THE ORDER DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A FINAL ORDER OR A NONFINAL ORDER THAT IS APPEALABLE UNDER FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.130. PLEASE READ.
  3. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: WITHIN TWENTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, APPELLANT SHALL FILE A RESPONSE IN THIS COURT THAT SHOWS CAUSE WHY THIS APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED BECAUSE IT APPEARS THAT THIS NOTICE OF APPEAL SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED BECAUSE IT APPEARS THAT THE NOTICE OF APPEAL WAS NOT TIMELY FILED WITHIN THIRTY DAYS OF RENDITIONO F THE ORDER(S) APPEALED. PLEASE READ.
  4. DescriptionSIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS ORDER: THIS CASE APPEARS TO SEEK REVIEW OF A NONFINAL ORDER AND SHALL PROCEED UNDER FLORIDA FULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.130. NO RECORD SHALL BE PREPARED OR TRANSMITTED TO THIS COURT UNLESS ORDERED. PLEASE READ.
  5. DescriptionACKNOWLEDGMENT FROM DISTRICT COURT
  6. DescriptionCOMPLIANCE CLOSED - SEE DOCKET FOR REASON action date changed to 10/30/2025
  7. DescriptionCOMPLIANCE CLOSED - SEE DOCKET FOR REASON set on 10/30/2025
  8. DescriptionCIVIL APPEAL RECORD DUE with a due date 1/5/2026 updated with compliance action of COMPLIANCE CLOSED - SEE DOCKET FOR REASON
  9. DescriptionCOMPLIANCE CLOSED - SEE DOCKET FOR REASON action date changed to 10/30/2025
  10. COMPLIANCE CLOSED - SEE DOCKET FOR REASON set on 10/30/2025
  11. CIVIL APPEAL PROPOSED INDEX DUE with a due date 12/22/2025 updated with compliance action of COMPLIANCE CLOSED - SEE DOCKET FOR REASON
  12. State Attorney Case Number modified: CC25-567
  13. Agency Case Number modified: 6D 25-2694
  14. Judge: RITENOUR , ANTHONY Assigned
  15. Compliance CV APPEAL RECORD DUE has been created with due date of 1/5/2026
  16. Compliance CV APPEAL PROP INDEX has been created with due date of 12/22/2025
  17. PROOF OF SUBMISSION TO 6DCA
  18. NOTICE OF APPEAL TRANSMITTAL FORM
  19. CLERK'S DETERMINATION OF CIVIL INDIGENCY APPROVED
  20. NOTICE OF APPEAL
  21. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $100.00 - INDIGENT

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more