Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- RULE 6.4(B) CERTIFICATE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND FOR SANCTIONS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
- GENERAL INFORMATION FORM
- NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS
- SUMMONS
- AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE - PERSONAL SERVICE - ANGELA M WHIDDON - 08-14-2025
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
- DEFENDANT'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIM
- SUMMONS
- PLAINTIFF'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE POSSESSION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PAYMENT OF PARTIAL USE AND OCCUPANCY AND ARREARAGES TO PLAINTIFF
- PLAINTIFF'S REPLY AND GENERAL DENIAL TO DEFENDANT'S ANSWER AND COUNTERCLAIMS
- RULE NISI - EMERGENCY MOTION - JUDGE DAVIS
- RULE NISI-ER MOTION-JUDGE DAVIS/ RULE NISI -SHOW CAUSE-JUDGE DAVIS/ RULE NISI-DEF'S MOTIONS HRG-JUDGE DAVIS - HEARD - REPORTED (SHARED) DENIED 0 PARTIES TO MEDIATE WITHIN 60 DAYS
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOPLAINTIFF'S EMERGENCY MOTION AND COUNTER-MOTION FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, TO SET CLOSING, AND FOR LIMITED LIS PENDENS RELIEF; IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR STATUS QUO AND REGISTRY PAYMENTS
- DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TOPLAINTIFF'S EMERGENCY MOTION AND COUNTER-MOTION FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, TO SET CLOSING, AND FOR LIMITED LIS PENDENS RELIEF; IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION FOR STATUS QUO AND REGISTRY PAYMENTS
- PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE RIGHT OF ENTRY TO INSPECT PROPTERTY
- RULE NISI - SHOW CAUSE - JUDGE DAVIS
- RULE NISI - COUNTER-MOTION FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, TO SET CLOSING, AND FOR LIMITED LIS PENDENS RELIEF, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO MAINTAIN STATUS QUO AND REGISTRY PAYMENTS - ATTY WHIDDON
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR DEFENDANT'S COUNTER-MOTION BEING HEARD ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2025
- PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR DEFENDANT'S COUNTER-MOTION BEING HEARD ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 2025
- DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE RIGHT OF ENTRY TO INSPECT PROPERTY
- MEDIATION ORDER
- NOTICE OF REFFERRAL TO MEDIATION
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
- FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
- ORDER
- NOTICE MEDIATION SCHEDULING NOTICE
- NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED MEDIATION
- CIVIL CALENDAR CALL FOR JURY WEEKS OF 1/26/2026, 1/30/2026, 2/9/2026, 2/13/2026, 3/9/2026, 3/13/2026, 3/16/2026, 3/20/2026, 4/20/2026, 4/24/2026,5/11/2026, AND 5/15/2026
- MEDIATION REPORT - NO AGREEMENT
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW JURY TRIAL DEMAND AS TO COUNTERCLAIM
- DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW JURY TRIAL DEMAND AS TO COUNTERCLAIM
- PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
- RULE 5.2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DISCOVERY MATERIALS
- NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL - ATTY JOHN K REZAC OBO PLTF
- NOTICE OF FILING OF ORIGINAL DISCOVERY
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE- DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
- DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO PLAINTIFF'S DEMAND FOR TRIAL BY JURY
- CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE - DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
- DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
- PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
- PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
- PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
- PLAINTIFF'S THEORY OF RECOVERY AND STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS AS TO WHICH THERE IS NO GENUINE ISSUE TO BE TRIED
- PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND FOR SANCTIONS AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In