Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-03-28
Status CASE CLOSED
Type Other Civil
Docket 9 entries
Disposition dismiss

Parties

Plaintiff Scanlan, Laura M|Hutto, Eric L
Defendant Henthorn, Dean
Photo of Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Judge

Hon. Wetzel Richard D

Knox County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. HECK ISSUED TO: CHILCOAT LAW LLC Check issued: 10/09/2025 Check #49053 $151.00 Payable to: CHILCOAT LAW LLC
  2. OMPLAINT FILED 03/28/2025 03:41 PM Attorney: MCCARTHY, PATRICK D
  3. UMMONS ISSUED BY CERTIFIED MAIL TO DEAN HENTHORN 9414 7266 9904 2236 6644 57
  4. ETURN RECEIPT FILED WITH DATE SIGNED DEAN HENTHORNE (4/2/25)
  5. RDER - COUNSEL SHALL WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER FILE THE APPROPRIATE MOTION AND ENTRY, A DISMISSAL OR NOTIFY THE COURT IN WRITING SHOULD THERE BE SOME VALID REASON AS TO WHY DEFAULT JUDGMENT CANNOT BE TAKEN AT THIS TIME. FAILURE TO RESPOND WILL RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  6. UDGMENT ENTRY -ORDERED THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE FILED ON MARCH 28, 2025 IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE . COPIES SENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 5(B).
  7. OTICE OF JOURNAL ENTRY FILING TO ATTYS. IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RULE 58(B), IT IS VERIFIED THAT COPIES HAVE BEEN SENT TO THE PARTIES AND/OR THEIR ATTORNEY OF RECORD IN A MANNER PRESCRIBED BY CIVIL RULE 5(B) ON THIS DAY.
  8. INAL RECORD PAGES FEE
  9. ASE FINISHED CASE FILED AWAY

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.