Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Mahoning County

Court

Mahoning County

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-23
Status CLOSED
Type Civil Common Pleas
Docket 38 entries
Disposition settled

Parties

Plaintiff U.s. Bank National Association
Defendant Sargent, Frank A
Photo of Hon. KRICHBAUM R SCOTT

Judge

Hon. KRICHBAUM R SCOTT

Mahoning County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. $5.00
  2. COMPLAINT FILED Receipt: 524832 Date: 07/24/2025
  3. LEGAL AID (TOSCV) FILED Receipt: 524832 Date: 07/24/2025
  4. LEGAL NEWS Receipt: 524832 Date: 07/24/2025
  5. CLERK COMPUTERIZATION FEE (CIVIL) Receipt: 524832 Date: 07/24/2025
  6. COURT COMPUTER RESEARCH (CIVIL) Receipt: 524832 Date: 07/24/2025
  7. CV-COURT MEDIATION PROGRAM Receipt: 524832 Date: 07/24/2025
  8. CV-SPECIAL PROJECTS FUND Receipt: 524832 Date: 07/24/2025
  9. CV-TECHNOLOGY FUND Receipt: 524832 Date: 07/24/2025
  10. COMPLAINT FILED ELECTRONICALLY COMPLAINT :: :: On behalf of Plaintiff: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION :: Filed By: ROBERT G WILLIAMS
  11. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE PRAECIPE FOR CERTIFIED MAIL :: :: On behalf of Plaintiff: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION :: Filed By: ROBERT G WILLIAMS
  12. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE PRAECIPE FOR PROCESS SERVER :: :: On behalf of Plaintiff: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION :: Filed By: ROBERT G WILLIAMS
  13. SUMMONS, COPY OF COMPLAINT ISSUED TO DEFT BY PERSONAL SERVICE(PROVEST)
  14. Issue Date: 08/14/2025 Service: CIVIL SUMMONS Method: (CP) PERSONAL SERVICE Provider: PROCESS SERVER Cost Per: $ SARGENT, FRANK A 59 MILL CREEK DR YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512 Tracking No: P000087025
  15. SUMMONS, COPY OF COMPLAINT ISSUED TO DEFT BY CERT MAIL
  16. Issue Date: 08/14/2025 Service: CIVIL SUMMONS Method: (CP) CERTIFIED MAIL Cost Per: $0.00 SARGENT, FRANK A 59 MILL CREEK DR YOUNGSTOWN, OH 44512 Tracking No: 941472669904224533983
  17. SUCCESSFUL SERVICE Method : (CP) CERTIFIED MAIL Issued : 08/14/2025 Service : CIVIL SUMMONS Served : 08/19/2025 Return : 08/21/2025 On : SARGENT, FRANK A Signed By : ILLEGIBLE SIGNATURE Reason : (CP) SUCCESSFUL Comment : Tracking #: 941472669904224533983
  18. SUMMONS RETURNED & FILED SERVED--FRANK SARGENT 8-19-25
  19. ANSWER OF ANSWER OF DEFENDANT FRANK A. SARGENT :: :: On behalf of Defendant: FRANK A SARGENT :: Filed By: JULIE ADAMIC
  20. Certificate of Service
  21. JE> CIVIL AGREED JUDGMENT ENTRY (W. MCKAY BY ASSIGNMENT) SEE ATTACHED IMAGE
  22. COST FOR JUDGMENT ENTRY FOR CLERK COMPUTERIZATION
  23. Certificate of Service
  24. $35.00
  25. $25.00
  26. $26.00
  27. $13.00
  28. $20.00
  29. $6.00
  30. $40.00
  31. $50.00
  32. $10.00
  33. $0.00
  34. $2.00
  35. $2.00
  36. $12.10
  37. $0.00
  38. $10.00

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more