Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Florida Civitech Unified Court

Court

Florida Civitech Unified Court

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-30
Status OPEN
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 37 entries
Disposition SETTLEMENT

Parties

Plaintiff Fulmer, James
Defendant Cook, Rachel M
Photo of Hon. Patterson Christopher N

Judge

Hon. Patterson Christopher N

Holmes County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. DescriptionNOTICE OF TAKING VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION
  2. DescriptionNOTICE OF SERVICE OF PROPOSAL FOR SETTLEMENT
  3. DescriptionPLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF NON-OBJECTION AND REQUEST FOR COPIES
  4. DescriptionNOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON PARTIES
  5. DescriptionPLAINTIFF JAMES FULMER'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  6. DescriptionNOTICE OF SERVING PLAINTIFF'S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  7. DescriptionDEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  8. DescriptionDEFENDANT RACHEL M. COOK'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  9. DescriptionCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT
  10. DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESS PURSUANT TO RULE 2.51
  11. DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESS PURSUANT TO RULE 2.51 PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED DESIGNATION OF ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESSES AND REQUEST FOR DESIGNATION OF ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESSES
  12. DEFENDANT'S FIRST REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  13. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE OF DEFENDANT'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  14. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF NON OBJECTION AND REQUEST FOR COPIES
  15. NOTICE OF PRODUCTION FROM NON-PARTIES
  16. DEFENDANT'S INITIAL DISCOVERY DISCLOSURES
  17. ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
  18. Defendant Attorney: DIERDRE T HARRIS Assigned to RACHEL M COOK
  19. DEFENDANTS DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESS PURSUANT TO RULE 2.51
  20. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
  21. PLAINTIFF'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
  22. RETURN OF SERVICE SERVED: RACHEL M. COOK 8/6/23
  23. CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER SETTING CAUSE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE
  24. RECEIPT
  25. Judge: PATTERSON , CHRISTOPHER Assigned
  26. PLAINTIFFS INITIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO RULE 1.280(A)
  27. SUMMONS ISSUED: 07/30/25
  28. PLAINTIFFS DESIGNATION OF ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESSES AND REQUEST FOR DESIGNATION OF ELECTRONIC MAIL ADDRESSES
  29. PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANT RACHEL M. COOK
  30. NOTICE OF SERVING REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION TO DEFENDANT REACHEL M COOK.
  31. NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT REACHEL M COOK.
  32. COMPLAINT WITH DISCOVERY ATTACHED
  33. CIVIL COVER SHEET
  34. Payment received: $410.00 Receipt Number MX 2025007543
  35. Assessment 1 Total Assessed $410.00 Balance Remaining $0.00
  36. Assessment 1 assessed at sum $410.00
  37. Attorney: Assigned to JAMES FULMER

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more