Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Polk County

Court

Polk County

Florida

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-09-11
Type Nega Negligence Auto
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Mather, Michael 201 North Franklin Street Tampa Fl 33602
Defendant Pieske, Anthony 82 Woodside Drive Lakeland Fl 33813
Photo of Hon. Reinaldo J Ojeda

Judge

Hon. Reinaldo J Ojeda

Polk County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF ANSWERS TO PLAINTIFFS INTERROGATORIES
  2. COMPLAINT
  3. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN - GENERAL TRACK
  4. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF FILING INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  5. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK - DELANEY PIESKE
  6. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK - ANTHONY PIESKE
  7. SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK - PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
  8. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  9. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  10. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  11. REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  12. REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  13. REQUEST TO PRODUCE
  14. NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT DELANEY PIESKE
  15. NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT ANTHONY PIESKE
  16. NOTICE OF SERVING INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY
  17. SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED- PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY BY SERVING REGISTERED AGENT
  18. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES UPON DEFENDANT, PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE
  19. COMPANY
  20. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES UPON DEFENDANT, ANTHONY PIESKE
  21. PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INITIAL DISCLOSURES UPON DEFENDANT, DELANEY PIESKE
  22. SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED- DELANEY PIESKE BY SERVING ANTHONY PIESKE
  23. SERVICE OF PROCESS SERVED- ANTHONY PIESKE
  24. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES
  25. DEFENDANTS, DELANEY PIESKE AND ANTHONY PIESKE'S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFF'S
  26. COMPLAINT
  27. DEFENDANTS, DELANEY PIESKE AND ANTOHNY PIESKE'S, INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  28. DEFENDANTS, DELANEY PIESKE AND ANTHONY PIESKE'S NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
  29. DEFENDANTS, DELANEY PIESKE AND ANTHONY PIESKE'S, REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF
  30. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF E-MAIL ADDRESSES PURSUANT TO RULE 2.516
  31. DEFENDANT PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANYS MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT III OF PLAINTIFFS COMPLAINT
  32. JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT / ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT "A"
  33. ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR PLAINTIFF TO AMEND COMPLAINT
  34. LETTER FROM ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
  35. DEFENDANTS DELANEY PIESKE AND ANTHONY PIESKES ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED
  36. COMPLAINT
  37. ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT
  38. ANSWER AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT
  39. DEFENDANT PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANYS NOTICE OF RULE 1.280(A) COMPLIANCE
  40. REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF
  41. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  42. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF MOTOR VEHICLE NEGLIGENCE INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF MICHAEL MATHER
  43. DEFENDANT PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANYS RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS
  44. DEFENDANT PROGRESSIVE SELECT INSURANCE COMPANYS RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more