Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-05-22
Type Ap Employment Security
Docket 41 entries
Disposition disposed

Parties

Plaintiff Amrine, Ictoria L.
Defendant State Of Missouri Division Of Employment Security

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. OA Filed with Commission
  2. pinion Dismissed Associated Entries: 11/25/2025 - Signed Majority Opinion
  3. igned Majority Opinion Associated Entries: 11/25/2025 - Opinion Dismissed
  4. enied as Moot Associated Entries: 07/08/2025 - Motion for Dismissal
  6. ase Submitted Scheduled For: 11/12/2025; DIVISION 1; 1; WESTERN DISTRICT CT OF APPEALS
  8. ase Docketed for oral argument on 12-NOV-2025 before Division 1: Sutton, P.J., Witt, and Thomson, JJ. Docket call is at 10:30 a.m.
  10. eq for Oral Argument Filed Appellant's request for Oral Argument within Appellant's Reply Brief
  11. aper Copy of Document Receivd Appellant's Reply Brief Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE
  12. ppellant's Reply Brief Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE
  13. lerk Remark This document is set to an increased security level due to the filer's failure to include a certificate of redaction compliance as required by Rule 84.015(e). The security may be lowered if the certificate is received.
  15. aper Copy of Document Receivd Respondent's Brief and Appendix Filed By: MICHAEL CALVEN REED On Behalf Of: STATE OF MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY
  16. enied Associated Entries: 07/21/2025 - Application for Transfer to SC
  17. orrespondence Sent Letter Regarding Oral Argument Request
  18. aper Copy of Document Due One paper copy of un-redacted Respondent's Brief and Appendix (securely bound) is due on or before: 01-AUG-2025
  19. ppendix Filed Respondent's Appendix Filed By: MICHAEL CALVEN REED On Behalf Of: STATE OF MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY Associated Entries: 07/25/2025 - Respondent's Brief
  20. espondent's Brief Filed By: MICHAEL CALVEN REED On Behalf Of: STATE OF MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY Associated Entries: 07/25/2025 - Appendix Filed +
  21. pplication for Transfer to SC Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE Associated Entries: 07/29/2025 - Denied
  22. lerk Remark This document is set to an increased security level due to the filer's failure to include a certificate of redaction compliance as required by Rule 84.015(e). The security may be lowered if the certificate is received.
  23. aken with Case Associated Entries: 07/08/2025 - Motion for Dismissal
  24. otion for Dismissal Filed By: MICHAEL CALVEN REED On Behalf Of: STATE OF MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY Associated Entries: 07/21/2025 - Taken with Case Associated Entries: 11/25/2025 - Denied as Moot
  25. ntry of Appearance Filed Filed By: MICHAEL CALVEN REED On Behalf Of: STATE OF MISSOURI DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY
  26. aper Copy of Document Receivd Amended Appellant's Brief and Appendix Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE
  27. ppendix Filed Appellant's Appendix Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE Associated Entries: 07/01/2025 - Amended Appellant's Brief
  28. mended Appellant's Brief Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE Associated Entries: 07/01/2025 - Appendix Filed +
  29. lerk Remark Both documents are set to an increased security level due to the filer's failure to include a certificate of redaction compliance as required by Rule 84.015(e). The security may be lowered if the certificate is received.
  30. enied Associated Entries: 06/18/2025 - Other Motion +
  31. rief Stricken Amended Appellant's Brief Due On or Before: 09-JUL-2025
  32. aper Copy of Document Receivd Appellant's Brief and Appendix Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE
  33. ther Motion Motion to Submit New Evidence Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE Associated Entries: 06/27/2025 - Denied
  34. lerk Remark This document is set to an increased security level due to the filer's failure to include a certificate of redaction compliance as required by Rule 84.015(e). The security may be lowered if the certificate is received.
  35. ppendix Filed Appellant's Appendix Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE Associated Entries: 06/18/2025 - Appellant's Brief
  36. ppellant's Brief Filed By: VICTORIA L. AMRINE Associated Entries: 06/18/2025 - Appendix Filed +
  37. ecord on Appeal Complete Filed By: LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
  38. ranscript Filed Filed By: LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
  39. ecord on Appeal Filed By: LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
  40. OA Filed in Appellate Court
  41. o Filing Fee Due

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more