Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Wayne County(Ohio)

Court

Wayne County(Ohio)

Ohio

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-08-18
Status OPEN
Type Miscellaneous Cases
Docket 44 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Bruner, Rhett
Defendant Tartan Builders Inc
Photo of Hon. SPITLER COREY E

Judge

Hon. SPITLER COREY E

Wayne County (OH)

Ohio

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED 08/18/2025 CASE NUMBER 2025 CVCX-X 001757
  2. X
  3. PAYMENT $14,559.37 RECEIPT #2025023598
  4. POUNDAGE FEE ASSESSED $245.26
  5. MONEY RECEIVED ON GARNISHMENT FEE ASSESSED $14280.29
  6. ELECTRONIC SERVICE TO RECIPIENTS: YARMESCH, DANIEL ANTHONY ATTACHMENT COUNT: 1 SENT DOCKET DESCRIPTIONS: CPJECR-10/21/2025
  7. JUDGMENT ENTRY: FEE ASSESSED $3.00
  8. JUDGMENT ENTRY: GARNISHMENT DISBURSEMENT
  9. CERTIFIED MAIL FAILED UNCLAIMED - MARTINEZ
  10. CERTIFIED MAIL FAILED UNCLAIMED - TARTAN
  11. PAYMENT $14,525.55 RECEIPT #2025023014
  12. MISC DEPOSIT (COSTS) FEE ASSESSED $14525.55
  13. ANSWER OF BANK ( WITH CHECK)
  14. ANSWER OF BANK - $14525.55 ON HOLD
  15. CERT MAIL SENT FEE ASSESSED $26.58
  16. CERTIFIED MAIL SENT - 33
  17. CERTIFIED MAIL SENT - 19
  18. CERTIFIED MAIL SENT - 83
  19. ORDER OF GARNISHMENT GRANTED FEE ASSESSED $3.00
  20. ORDER OF GARNISHMENT GRANTED CC: JPMORGAN, TARTAN, MARTINEZ - CERT MAIL
  21. GARNISHMENT SET FOR 10/30/2025 AT 10:30 AM IN CP3, JDG: SPITLER, COREY E
  22. NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTOR
  23. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  24. PAYMENT $85.00 RECEIPT #2025021251
  25. DEP/ GARN, JDGMT DEBTOR EXAM, EXECUTION FEE ASSESSED $50.00
  26. GARN, JDGMT DEBTOR EXAM, EXECUTION FEE ASSESSED $35.00
  27. JUDGE SPITLER, COREY E: ASSIGNED
  28. ELECTRONIC SERVICE TO RECIPIENTS: YARMESCH, DANIEL ANTHONY ATTACHMENT COUNT: 2 SENT DOCKET DESCRIPTIONS: CJRTCV-9/17/2025,CERJI-9/17/2025
  29. CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT RETURNED...FILED IN WAYNE COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT
  30. CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT ISSUED TO ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF
  31. PRECIPE FOR CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT
  32. ADDITIONAL POSTAGE CHARGES FEE ASSESSED $1.24
  33. CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
  34. EXEMPLIFIED COPY
  35. NOTICE OF FILING OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT CC: MARTINEZ (CERTIFICATE OF MAILING), ATTY (SASE)
  36. AFFIDAVIT OF DANIEL A. YARMESCH
  37. INSTRUCTIONS FOR SERVICE
  38. PAYMENT $25.00 RECEIPT #2025018196
  39. ATTORNEY: YARMESCH, DANIEL ANTHONY ASSIGNED TO BRUNER, AUTUMN
  40. ATTORNEY: YARMESCH, DANIEL ANTHONY ASSIGNED TO BRUNER, RHETT
  41. CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT FEE ASSESSED $25.00
  42. ATTORNEY: SCHAEFFER, SCOTT NATHAN ASSIGNED TO BRUNER, AUTUMN
  43. ATTORNEY: SCHAEFFER, SCOTT NATHAN ASSIGNED TO BRUNER, RHETT
  44. WAYNE COUNTY CASE#: 2025 CVCX 001757 M

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more