Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- Agreement for Judgment approved by the Court. Judge: Speicher, Hon. Howard P.
- Case assigned to the Average Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
- Land Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 433144 Date: 08/09/2022
- Land Court surcharge Receipt: 433144 Date: 08/09/2022
- Land Court summons Receipt: 433144 Date: 08/09/2022
- Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
- Event Scheduled Judge: Speicher, Hon. Howard P. Event: Case Management Conference Date: 09/22/2022 Time: 10:30 AM
- The case has been assigned to the A Track. Notice sent. Notice of Judge and Track Assignment was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Sharon M Petrillo, Esq. [email protected] Sent On: 08/22/2022 10:40:15
- Summons returned to Court with service on Mary Gagliardi By and through attorney-in-fact Samuel S. Gagliardi, Rosanne Tranfagalia filed.
- Defendants' Motion for Leave of Court to file a Late Answer to include Third Party Complaint, Counterclaim and/or Necessary Joinder of Party,filed.
- First Amended Complaint filed.
- Case management conference held by videoconference. Early intervention event held. Attorneys Sharon Petrillo and David Alvin Stasio appeared. The parties indicated their willingness to resolve the matter through either defendants defaulting, an agreement for judgment, or plaintiff filing a motion for summary judgment in which case defendants would be required to respond within 30 days. The court took no action on defendants' motion for leave to file a late answer
- Alternative Dispute Resolution: Early Intervention Event held. Judge: Speicher, Hon. Howard P.
- Joint Statement for Case Management Conference,filed
- Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Leave of Court to file a Late Answer to include Third Party Complaint, Counterclaim and/or Necessary Joinder of Party,filed.
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In