Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Indiana appeal court

Court

Indiana appeal court

Indiana

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-01-16
Type Small Claim
Docket 16 entries
Disposition appeal is dismissed

Docket Entries

  1. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/23/25 Money Order from Appellant for payment of filing fee. PostmarkDate: 01/16/2025
  2. ocument Transmitted
  3. ransmitted on Transfer (Supreme Court)
  4. etition to Transfer Certificate of Service-Mailed 03/28/25 Attorney: INGRAM, JOHN File Stamp: 03/28/2025
  5. otice of Defect Cured Clerk Comments: Petition to Transfer - Appellant Party: INGRAM, JOHN File Stamp: 03/28/2025
  6. ocument Transmitted
  7. eceived Document Receive Date: 03/21/25 Petition to Transfer - certificate of service does not specify by name the opposing party/counsel served. Also filing fee was not tendered. PostmarkDate: 03/14/2025
  8. otice of Defect Issued Petition to Transfer - Appellant Party: INGRAM, JOHN Serve: GREEN, LEE Issue Date: 03/25/2025
  9. ocument Transmitted
  10. ote Money Order returned to Appellant via mail since Court declined to accept the appeal.
  11. rder Dismissing Appeal with Prejudice order denying belated appeal Having reviewed the matter, the Court finds and orders as follows: 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file, as of the date of this order, Appellant's Motion to File a Belated Appeal received on January 23, 2025. 2. Appellant's Motion to File a Belated Appeal is denied, and this appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send this order to the parties, the trial court, and the Knox Circuit and Superior Courts Clerk. 4. The Knox Circuit and Superior Courts Clerk is directed to file this order under Cause Number 47D02-2408-SC-192, and, pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 77(D), the Clerk shall place the contents of this order in the Record of Judgments and Orders. Brown, Pyle, JJ., Baker, Sr.J., concur. Judicial Officer: Altice, Robert R. Serve: GREEN, LEE Serve: INGRAM, JOHN File Stamp: 02/14/2025
  12. ocument Transmitted
  13. otion to File Belated Appeal Certificate of Service-Hand Delivered 01/17/25 (as stated) Attorney: INGRAM, JOHN Party: INGRAM, JOHN File Stamp: 02/14/2025
  14. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/23/25 Notice of Appearance of John Ingram - certificate of service does not name party/counsel served by name and service date is after post mark date. PostmarkDate: 01/16/2025
  15. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/23/25 Motion to File a Belated Appeal - certificate of service does not name party/counsel served by name and service date is after post mark date. PostmarkDate: 01/16/2025
  16. eceived Document Receive Date: 01/23/25 Notice of Appeal by John Ingram - pending ruling on Motion to File Belated. PostmarkDate: 01/16/2025

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more