Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Massachusetts Unified County

Court

Massachusetts Unified County

Massachusetts

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-11-07
Status Open
Type Certiorari Action, G. L. C. 249 4
Docket 6 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Amaro, Paul Vincent
Defendant District Court Department New Bedford Division

Docket Entries

  1. Docket Note: 2 copies of complaint and civil action cover sheet, Determination Regarding Fees and Costs, Tracking orders, 1 Summons mailed to the Plaintiff.
  2. Case assigned to: DCM Track X - Accelerated was added on 11/07/2025
  3. Original civil complaint filed.
  4. Civil action cover sheet filed.
  5. Determination regarding normal fees and costs REFFERRED TO A JUDGE , pursuant to G. L. c. 261, 27C(2). Affidavit is not complete as the applicant does not specify the fees and costs he wants waived.
  6. Determination regarding normal fees and costs ALLOWED by judge waived in full , pursuant to G. L. c. 261, 27C(2). Extra Fees and Costs: The application is DENIED with respect to the extra fees and costs indicated in the application, because I find that: need for such fees and costs not set forth.

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more