Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2025-07-16
Status OPEN
Type Auto Negligence
Docket 30 entries

Parties

Plaintiff Howard, Kinley|Howard, Dana
Defendant Burke, Janice
Photo of Hon. Pitre Stephen Anthony

Judge

Hon. Pitre Stephen Anthony

Escambia County (FL)

Florida

View Judge Profile

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. CASE FILED 07/16/2025 CASE NUMBER 2025 CA 000985
  2. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF KINLEY HOWARD'S VERIFIED ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT JANICE BURKE'S FIRST INTERROGATORIES
  3. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFF DANA HOWARD'S VERIFIED ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT JANICE BURKE'S FIRST CONSORTIUM INTERROGATORIES
  4. PLAINTIFF DANA HOWARD'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT JANICE BURKE'S FIRST CONSORTIUM REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  5. PLAINTIFF KINLEY HOWARD'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT JANICE BURKE'S FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
  6. DEFENDANTS NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 1.280 INITIAL DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE
  7. DEFENDANTS CONSORTIUM REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF DANA HOWARD
  8. DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO PRODUCE TO PLAINTIFF KINLEY HOWARD
  9. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF CONSORTIUM INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF DANA HOWARD
  10. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF KINLEY HOWARD
  11. DEFENDANT JANICE BURKE'S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
  12. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF FINAL SERVICE
  13. PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF FILING RETURN OF SERVICE
  14. ALIAS SUMMONS ISSUED
  15. PROPOSED AMENDED SUMMONS
  16. SUMMONS ISSUED EMAILED TO ATTORNEY
  17. PAYMENT $10.00 RECEIPT #2025061545
  18. NOTICE OF FILING SUMMONS RETURNED NOT SERVED
  19. PROPOSED SUMMONS
  20. ORDER REGARDING REQUIRED REPORTING
  21. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER - GENERAL TRACK
  22. NOTICE OF SERVICE OF PLAINTIFFS INITIAL DISCLOSURES
  23. SUMMONS ISSUED
  24. PAYMENT $410.00 RECEIPT #2025054940
  25. PLAINTIFF'S ATTORNEY: BRADLEY, BRENT F ASSIGNED
  26. PITRE, STEPHEN A: ASSIGNED
  27. EMAIL DESIGNATION.
  28. COMPLAINT
  29. PROPOSED SUMMONS
  30. COVERSHEET

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.