Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Unified County

Court

Missouri Unified County

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-11-12
Type Cc Other Miscellaneous Actions
Docket 5 entries
Disposition disposed

Parties

Defendant City Of St. Louis Board Of Election Commissioners|Hunter, Jerry|Barbaglia, Joseph|Kraemer, Geraldine|Schwartz, Andy|Fitzpatrick, Scott
Photo of Hon. Whyte Joseph Patrick

Judge

Hon. Whyte Joseph Patrick

St. Louis city (MO)

Missouri

View Judge Profile

Docket Entries

  1. et Filed in Circuit Ct PETITION FOR PRELIMINARY ORDER IN MANDAMUS AND PERMANENT WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTION; Exhibit 1 pages 1-40 - Audit Petition; Exhibit 1 pages 41-80 - Audit Petition; Exhibit 1 pages 81-119 - Audit Petition. Filed By: WILLIAM KISTNER On Behalf Of: TAMEKA STIGERS, EMMETT COLEMAN, ANDREW POLACEK
  2. iling Info Sheet eFiling Filed By: WILLIAM KISTNER
  3. ote to Clerk eFiling Filed By: WILLIAM KISTNER
  4. egal File Index Filed RULE 94.03 INDEX. Filed By: WILLIAM KISTNER On Behalf Of: TAMEKA STIGERS, EMMETT COLEMAN, ANDREW POLACEK
  5. uggestions in Support SUGGESTIONS IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR PRELIMINARY ORDER IN MANDAMUS AND PERMANENT WRIT OF MANDAMUS. Filed By: WILLIAM KISTNER On Behalf Of: TAMEKA STIGERS, EMMETT COLEMAN, ANDREW POLACEK

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more