Your case is unique, but you are not alone.
About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.
Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?
How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?
AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.
Full Analytics Report
- Complete case narrative
- Judge details and rulings
- Case disposition and outcome
- All docket entries
- Related cases and filings
Case Information
Parties
Lawyers
Docket Entries
- DescriptionEvent HEARING scheduled on 11/13/2025 at 0200 PM, MX - Judge presiding.
- DescriptionNOTICE OF HEARING
- DescriptionNOTICE OF FILING ORIGINAL NOTE AND MORTGAGE
- DescriptionMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND TAXATION OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COST
- DescriptionORDER OF JUDICIAL DEFAULT AGAINST FRANKLIN'S PROMISE COALITION,INC
- DescriptionORDER OF JUDICIAL DEFAULT ON JAMES E. FRAZIER A/K/A JAMES ETHAN FRAZIER A/K/A JAMES FRAZIER
- DescriptionORDER OF JUDICIAL DEFAULT ON UNKNOWN TENTANT IN POSSESION 1 &2 N/K/A ELZIE SHIVER
- DescriptionAMENDED DEFAULT ENTERED BY CLERK
- DescriptionDEFAULT ENTERED BY CLERK
- AFFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE
- MILITARY/NON- MILITARY AFFIDAVIT
- MOTION FOR DEFAULT AND DEFAULT
- NOTICE OF APPEARANCE ON BEHALF OF FRANKLIN COUNTY COARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AND DESIGANTION OF EMAIL ADDRESS
- ANSWERS OF FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
- ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY JUDICIAL DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT
- ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY JUDICIAL DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENETERED AGAINST DEFENDANT
- ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY JUDICIAL DEFAULT SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED AGAINST DEFENDANT
- RETURN OF SERVICE SERVED ON 07-14-2025 (EMILY FRAZIER)
- RETURN OF SERVICE SERVED ON 07-15-2025 (JOE TAYLOR)
- RETURN OF SERVICE SERVED ON 07-14-2025 (UNKNOWN TENANT IN POSSESION 1)
- RETURN OF SERVICE SERVED ON 07-14-2025 (UNKNOWN TENANT IN POSSESION 2)
- RETURN OF SERVICE SERVED ON 07-14-2025 (JAMES FRAZIER)
- RETURN OF SERVICE SERVED ON 08-04-2025 (FRANKLIN COUNTY POLITICAL SUBDIVISION)
- RETURN OF SERVICE SERVED ON 07-14-2025 (JAMES E. FRAZIER)
- ANSWER FROM DEFENDANT EMILY L. FRAZIER
- NOTICE OF COMPLETION OR COMPLIANCE PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF COMPLIANCE WITH INITIAL DISCVOERY DISCLOSURES
- UNIFORM ORDER FOR ACTIVE,DIFFERENTIAL CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT
- SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS ISSUED BY CLERK
- Payment received: $1,967.50 Receipt Number 14 7150
- Assessment 1 Total Assessed $1,967.50 Balance Remaining $0.00
- NOTICE PLAINTIFFS INITIAL DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE
- NOTICE PLAINTIFF'S POTENTIAL FACT WITNESS DISCLOSURE PURSUANT FRCP 1.280A
- NOTICE
- NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN COURT FILING
- DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESS
- NOTICE OF FILING CERTIFICATION OF NOTE POSSESSION
- SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED BY CLERK
- SUMMONS TO BE ISSUED BY CLERK
- VALUE CALCULATION OF REAL PROPERTY
- NTC OF LIS PENDENS
- COMPLAINT VERIFIED COMPLAINT TO FORECLOSURE MORTGAGE
- CIVIL COVER SHEET
- Assessment 1 assessed at sum $1,967.50
- Judge: ALLMAN , FRANCIS J Assigned
Get Free Case Details
Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.
By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.
Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In