Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase

Case Information

Filed 2022-04-26
Status Closed
Type Mrc Determine Validity Of Encumbrances, G.l. Chapter 240, 11 14
Docket 18 entries
Disposition judgment of dismissal

Parties

Plaintiff Brodmerkle, Virginia
Defendant Town Of New Braintree, Massachusetts|Walker, Randall|Howland, William C.|Chenevert, Joseph

Lawyers

Docket Entries

  1. Case Disposed by Judgment of Dismissal After Nisi Order that was returnable on .
  2. Case assigned to the Average Track per Land Court Standing Order 1:04.
  3. Land Court miscellaneous filing fee Receipt: 430466 Date: 04/26/2022
  4. Land Court surcharge Receipt: 430466 Date: 04/26/2022
  5. Land Court summons Receipt: 430466 Date: 04/26/2022
  6. Uniform Counsel Certificate for Civil Cases filed by Plaintiff.
  7. The case has been assigned to the A Track. Notice sent.
  8. Event Scheduled Judge: Roberts, Hon. Jennifer S.D. Event: Case Management Conference VIA ZOOM Date: 06/02/2022 Time: 09:00 AM Email notice to: Attorney Mark A. Tanner.
  9. Appearance of John R Hucksam, Jr., Esq., Noemi Kawamoto, Esq., Paul R DeRensis, Esq. for Town of New Braintree, Massachusetts, Randall Walker Member of the New Braintree Board of Selectmen, William C. Howland Member of the New Braintree Board of Selectmen, Joseph Chenevert Member of the New Braintree Board of Selectmen, filed
  10. Summons returned to Court with service on Town of New Braintree, Massachusetts filed. 05/12/2022: Service by certified green card signed by L. Hoffman. 05/09/2022: Service by certified green cared signed by L. Hoffman.
  11. Event Resulted: Status Conference in lieu of Case Management Conference scheduled on: 06/02/2022 09:00 AM Has been: Held via video. Attorney Ryan K. O'Hara appeared for plaintiff and Attorney John R. Hucksam, Jr. appeared for defendants. Attorney O'Hara reported that the parties are currently in the process of drafting a settlement agreement, which he anticipates will be finalized shortly. Attorney Hucksam agreed with Attorney O'Hara's assessment. The parties are to submit an emailed status report to Sessions Clerk Hayes by July 1, 2022 if this case has not been earlier dismissed. Email notice to: Attorney Ryan K. O'Hara and Attorney John R. Hucksam, Jr. Hon. Jennifer S.D. Roberts, Presiding
  12. Notice of Docket Entry: Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Mark Allan Tanner, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: John R Hucksam, Jr., Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Paul R DeRensis, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Noemi Kawamoto, Esq. [email protected] null: File Copy Sent On: 06/10/2022 10:08:15
  13. Scheduled Judge: Roberts, Hon. Jennifer S.D. Event: Status Conference VIA ZOOM Date: 09/28/2022 Time: 09:00 AM Email notice to: Attorney Mark A. Tanner; Attorney Paul R. DeRensis; Attorney Noemi Kawamoto; and Attorney John R. Hucksam, Jr.
  14. Letter from Attorney Tanner indicating that the case has settled; 60-day Nisi Order requested; and request to vacate the September 27, 2022 Status Conference via Zoom, filed by email.
  15. 60 Day Nisi Order issued. Returnable 11/25/2022. (Copies emailed to Attorneys Mark Tanner, John Hucksam, Jr., Paul DeRensis, and Noemi Kawamoto)
  16. Event Resulted: Status Conference scheduled on: 09/28/2022 09:00 AM Has been: Canceled Hon. Jennifer S.D. Roberts, Presiding
  17. Notice of Docket Entry: Upon joint request of counsel the nisi order is extended 60 days to January 31, 2023. Email notice to: Attorney Mark A. Tanner; Attorney Paul R. DeRensis; Attorney Noemi Kawamoto; and Attorney John R. Hucksam, Jr. Judge: Roberts, Hon. Jennifer S.D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Mark Allan Tanner, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: John R Hucksam, Jr., Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Paul R DeRensis, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Noemi Kawamoto, Esq. [email protected] Sent On: 11/28/2022 14:22:15
  18. Notice of Docket Entry: No stipulation of dismissal or agreement having been filed prior to the expiration of the extended nisi order, this matter is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Email notice to: Attorney Mark A. Tanner; Attorney Paul R. DeRensis; Attorney Noemi Kawamoto; and Attorney John R. Hucksam, Jr. Judge: Roberts, Hon. Jennifer S.D. Notice of Docket Entry was generated and sent to: Plaintiff: Mark Allan Tanner, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: John R Hucksam, Jr., Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Paul R DeRensis, Esq. [email protected] Defendant: Noemi Kawamoto, Esq. [email protected] Sent On: 02/01/2023 14:32:11

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.