Your case is unique, but you are not alone.

About 41,000 new cases are filed in U.S. courts every weekday. Behind each one is a person trying to understand what happens next. Here’s what the public record can tell you about this matter — and about the people deciding it.

  • Know your judge

    Every judge has a pattern — what they grant, what they deny, how they handle the kinds of motions your case will see.

  • Know your attorney

    See an attorney’s actual track record — case types, courts, and how they’ve performed in front of this judge before.

  • Know your court

    Every courthouse has its own rhythm — filing-to-resolution times, common dispositions, how often cases like yours settle.

Is this judge more likely to rule for the plaintiff or the defendant in cases of this type?

How has your attorney actually performed in front of this judge?

AICasePredict surfaces patterns from public court records. We don’t predict outcomes and we don’t recommend changing your attorney — that’s a conversation for you and them. We just show you what the record already says.

Full Analytics Report

  • Complete case narrative
  • Judge details and rulings
  • Case disposition and outcome
  • All docket entries
  • Related cases and filings
$20
One-time purchase
Photo of Missouri Eastern Appellate Court

Court

Missouri Eastern Appellate Court

Missouri

View Court Profile

Case Information

Filed 2025-08-08
Type Ap Employment Security
Docket 9 entries

Docket Entries

  1. NOA Filed with Commission
  2. Clerk Remark Copy of Court Order Issued October 21, 2025 mailed to pro se appellant
  3. Court Order Issued Appellant's Brief was filed on October 15, 2025. Appellant's initial brief fails to comply with Supreme Court Rule 84.04 regarding appellate briefs in at least the following ways: (1) fails to follow the format of appellate briefs, including a detailed table of cases and authorities cited within the brief and table of contents listing each required section with page references under Rule 84.04(a); (2) fails to contain a jurisdictional statement that complies with Rule 84.04(b); (3) fails to contain a fair and concise statement of facts relevant to the questions presented in the appeal with citation to specific page references to the record on appeal, Rule 84.04(c); (4) fails to provide points relied on that specifically identify the ruling or action of the administrative agency being challenged, the legal reasons for the appellant's claim of reversible error, and why, in the context of the case, those legal reasons support the claim of reversible error without consolidating multiple, independent claims into one point relied on, and with citation to all authorities, not to exceed four, immediately following, Rule 84.04(d)(2) & (5); (5) fails to contain arguments corresponding to each point relied on with a concise statement describing both whether the error was preserved for appellate review and the applicable standard of review and also reference to legal authority and specific page references to the record on appeal to support the argument, Rule 84.04(e); (6) fails to contain a certificate of compliance and certificate of service on the opposing party under Rule 84.06; and 2 (7) fails to separately file, with its own table of contents, an appendix that complies with Rule 84.04(h) and Local Rule 365. We must hold pro se appellants to the same standards as attorneys and all appellants must comply with the Supreme Court Rules governing the contents of appellate briefs. Covington v. Better Business Bureau, 253 S.W.3d 95,97 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008); see also Lexow v. Boeing Co., 643 S.W.3d 501, 505 (Mo. banc 2022). A brief that substantially fails to comply with Rule 84.04 is inadequate and the appeal must be dismissed. Id. Appellant is directed to review ?The ABC's of Appellate Practice? published on our website at https://www.courts.mo.gov/page.jsp?id=184 Appellant is granted until November 21, 2025, to file an amended brief that substantially complies with Rule 84. If Appellant fails to do so, this appeal shall be dismissed
  4. Appellant's Brief One paper copy of brief received, scanned, and attached
  5. Record on Appeal Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
  6. Clerk Remark ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER MAILED TO JAMIE LUEBBERT. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT LETTER, PRO SE INFORMATION, REDACTION REQUIREMENTS & REDACTION CHECKLIST MAILED TO TRACY LEE.
  7. Acknowledgement Letter Sent
  8. NOA Filed in Appellate Court
  9. No Filing Fee Due

See the patterns behind this case

The free view above tells you who’s in the room. The detailed reports below show how the room tends to behave — using the same public records lawyers quietly rely on before every hearing.

  • Judge Report

    How this judge has ruled in cases like yours — case mix, motion outcomes, and historical docket. Judges set the floor of what’s possible in your courtroom.

  • Attorney vs Judge Report

    Everything in the Judge Report, plus how your attorney has actually performed in front of this judge. Attorneys move you off the floor — or don’t.

One-time payment, no subscription. Reports describe past public court activity — they don’t predict outcomes and they aren’t legal advice.

Get Free Case Details

Enter your email to receive case information including parties, docket entries, and status updates.

By submitting you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Need this case removed? Enter your email above — the confirmation email includes a case removal link.

Legal Analytics Has Been Featured In

Featured in Forbes, Bloomberg, The New Yorker, Above The Law, American Bar Association, and more